underground utility locating · Indiana

Locating Holdings LH001 (HQ) 9900

Indianapolis, IN · ~338 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Locating Holdings LH001 (HQ) 9900 runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical underground utility locating workplace, earning a grade C.

Locating Holdings LH001 (HQ) 9900: 0.0 TCR = 0% of underground utility locating BLS 2.6 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Locating Holdings LH001 (HQ) 9900 safety composite

Locating Holdings LH001 (HQ) 9900 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Locating Holdings LH001 (HQ) 9900 held a steady TCR band

Locating Holdings LH001 (HQ) 9900's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561990 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/8
  • PHOTO Great Falls, MT
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~338 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Great Falls, MT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Locating Holdings LH001 (HQ) 9900 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Locating Holdings LH001 (HQ) 9900 averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the underground utility locating BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Locating Holdings LH001 (HQ) 9900 TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Locating Holdings LH001 (HQ) 9900 falls in its industry

208 underground utility locating establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 8 underground utility locating employers in Indiana.

Locating Holdings LH001 (HQ) 9900 (338 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Locating Holdings LH001 (HQ) 9900
Locating Holdings LH001 (HQ) 9900 (338 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Locating Holdings LH001 (HQ) 9900 has more employees than the underground utility locating median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561990 · IN · Indianapolis

208 underground utility locating employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Great Falls, MT 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Web Industries, Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR AECOM Field Services, LLC 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southpointe Constructin Services, LLC 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE GLOBAL PLASTICS 338 FTE
STATE-SIZE Multimatic Indiana 338 FTE
STATE-SIZE Multimatic Butler Indiana 338 FTE
STATE-SIZE US Foods Indianapolis 338 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1655 3rd St,San Francisco (MB3 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 30 7th Avenue 338 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hoffman Estates High School 338 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marriott's Newport Coast Villas 338 FTE
NAT-SIZE Printful, Inc. (Westlake, Charlotte) 338 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.