Employer · Florida

Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter 17900 Beeline Hw (5235)

Jupiter, FL · ~1,170 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter 17900 Beeline Hw (5235) runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade A.

Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter 17900 Beeline Hw (5235): 0.9 TCR = 28% of industry BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter 17900 Beeline Hw (5235) safety composite

Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter 17900 Beeline Hw (5235) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter 17900 Beeline Hw (5235) held a steady TCR band

Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter 17900 Beeline Hw (5235)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.9 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.9 · 2017=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336411 · Jupiter, FL AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #6/24
  • PHOTO Bell - Plant 5
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~1,170 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bell - Plant 5 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter 17900 Beeline Hw (5235) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter 17900 Beeline Hw (5235) averages 0.9 TCR (28% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter 17900 Beeline Hw (5235) TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter 17900 Beeline Hw (5235) falls in its industry

390 industry establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 24 industry employers in Florida.

Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter 17900 Beeline Hw (5235) (1,170 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter 17900 Beeline Hw (5235)
Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter 17900 Beeline Hw (5235) (1,170 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter 17900 Beeline Hw (5235) has more employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.9 0.8 11 0 0
2016 0.9 0.6 10 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336411 · FL · Jupiter

390 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 95 employers in Jupiter, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bell - Plant 5 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Machine Shop 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Honda Aircraft Company, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US UT Vineyard S Geneva Rd (3970) 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6458-OCAL 1,171 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - MIA5 1,167 FTE
STATE-SIZE FL0361VS 1,167 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pratt & Whitney - West Palm Beach FL 1,174 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pratt & Whitney - West Palm Beach 1,579 FTE
CITY-NEAR Asplundh Tree Expert LLC-055 702 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter Beeline Hwy DFC (5295) 691 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2045-00001W 632 FTE
NAT-TCR N and R of New Madrid LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Solutions : IS - MFG US - Selmer, TN - Busway 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SMC Electric Joplin 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR TRW Automotive-Marshall 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Worcester (Mawor) 1,170 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thomas Memorial Hospital 1,170 FTE
NAT-SIZE SNDGCA64 1,170 FTE
NAT-SIZE 8807710-Abercrombie & Fitch 1,170 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.