Aircraft manufacturing · North Carolina

Honda Aircraft Company, LLC

Greensboro, NC · ~1,259 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Honda Aircraft Company, LLC runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Honda Aircraft Company, LLC: 0.9 TCR = 28% of Aircraft manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Honda Aircraft Company, LLC safety composite

Honda Aircraft Company, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Honda Aircraft Company, LLC held a steady TCR band

Honda Aircraft Company, LLC's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.8 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.8 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336411 · Greensboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #2/9
  • PHOTO Machine Shop
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 87 inj
  • SIZE ~1,259 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Machine Shop (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Honda Aircraft Company, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Honda Aircraft Company, LLC averages 0.9 TCR (28% of the Aircraft manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Honda Aircraft Company, LLC TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Honda Aircraft Company, LLC falls in its industry

390 Aircraft manufacturing establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 9 Aircraft manufacturing employers in North Carolina.

Honda Aircraft Company, LLC (1,259 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Honda Aircraft Company, LLC
Honda Aircraft Company, LLC (1,259 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Honda Aircraft Company, LLC has more employees than the Aircraft manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.0 0.7 8 0 0
2022 0.6 0.4 4 1 0
2021 1.5 0.3 4 9 0
2020 0.4 0.3 4 0 0
2019 0.8 0.5 11 0 0
2018 0.8 0.7 13 0 0
2017 1.4 0.8 27 0 0
2016 0.8 0.7 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336411 · NC · Greensboro

390 Aircraft manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Machine Shop 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bell - BHT Piney Flats 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Atomics - Adelanto - AA13 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter 17900 Beeline Hw (5235) 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Caswell Developmental Center 1,256 FTE
STATE-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 1,263 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coty US LLC 1,264 FTE
STATE-SIZE BSH Home Appliance Corp 1,266 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4592 Great Falls, MT 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #214 SPRINGFIELD, IL 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #843 SPARTANBURG, SC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Custom Agronomics 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0558 - Albany DC 1,259 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Luke's Meridian Medical Center 1,259 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3801 - Midlothian DC 1,259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northwest Local School District 1,259 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.