Employer · Maryland

Lockheed Martin Corporation US MD Pax River Bronson (5381)

Patuxent River, MD · ~21 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lockheed Martin Corporation US MD Pax River Bronson (5381) runs at 212% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade F.

Lockheed Martin Corporation US MD Pax River Bronson (5381): 9.5 TCR = 212% of industry BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lockheed Martin Corporation US MD Pax River Bronson (5381) safety composite

Lockheed Martin Corporation US MD Pax River Bronson (5381) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−19.0

2018→2019

Lockheed Martin Corporation US MD Pax River Bronson (5381) injury rate improved

Lockheed Martin Corporation US MD Pax River Bronson (5381)'s TCR fell 19.0 from 19.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 19.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=19.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Patuxent River, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.5 · 212% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/25
  • PHOTO GUC GUNNISON COUNTY…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GUC GUNNISON COUNTY AIRPORT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Lockheed Martin Corporation US MD Pax River Bronson (5381) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lockheed Martin Corporation US MD Pax River Bronson (5381) averages 9.5 TCR (212% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lockheed Martin Corporation US MD Pax River Bronson (5381) TCR series: 2018=19 · 2019=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Lockheed Martin Corporation US MD Pax River Bronson (5381) falls in its industry

992 industry establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 25 industry employers in Maryland.

Lockheed Martin Corporation US MD Pax River Bronson (5381) (21 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lockheed Martin Corporation US MD Pax River Bronson (5381)
Lockheed Martin Corporation US MD Pax River Bronson (5381) (21 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Lockheed Martin Corporation US MD Pax River Bronson (5381) has fewer employees than the industry median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 19.0 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · MD · Patuxent River

992 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 14 employers in Patuxent River, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GUC GUNNISON COUNTY AIRPORT 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR IAC Amarillo 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Customs Border Protection Great Lakes 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR IAC Victorville 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Salisbury Hatchery #2 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1996-Galena, MD (Monsanto Co.) 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mag Spec Chemicals OH 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Orsted - Annapolis 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR DI - Navy Test Wing Atlantic - Pax River 999 FTE
CITY-NEAR NWTL 842 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Patuxent River Campus (1431) 352 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US MD Pax River Standley Rd (1431) 339 FTE
NAT-TCR Wilmington DE 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Oh Neo140 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Aurora Health and Rehabilitation Skilled Nursing and Long- Term Care 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Wire Form Division of Iowa 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE West Coast Industrial Coatings 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Traffic Control, LLC. Hixson 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE 447 ABC Supply Co., inc 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE 304 ABC Supply Co., Inc 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.