Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) · Pennsylvania

Lockridge Logistics LLC

Philadelphia, PA · ~52 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lockridge Logistics LLC runs at 194% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) workplace, earning a grade D.

Lockridge Logistics LLC: 8.7 TCR = 194% of Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lockridge Logistics LLC safety composite

Lockridge Logistics LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 8.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lockridge Logistics LLC: 10.3 → 13.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 13.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.49× in 2024

Lockridge Logistics LLC's TCR rose 2.7 from 10.3 in 2022 to 13.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492210 · Philadelphia, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.7 · 194% of ind

  • DART 13.0 DART
  • RANK #12/54
  • PHOTO KDN Logistics, LLP
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KDN Logistics, LLP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Lockridge Logistics LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lockridge Logistics LLC averages 8.7 TCR (194% of the Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lockridge Logistics LLC TCR series: 2022=10.3 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=13 · BLS 4.5

Where Lockridge Logistics LLC falls in its industry

1,452 Delivery service (except as pa establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 11.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 54 Delivery service (except as pa employers in Pennsylvania.

Lockridge Logistics LLC (52 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Lockridge Logistics LLC
Lockridge Logistics LLC (52 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8

Lockridge Logistics LLC has fewer employees than the Delivery service (except as part of inte median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 11.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.0 13.0 5 0 0
2023 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2022 10.3 10.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492210 · PA · Philadelphia

1,452 Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,431 employers in Philadelphia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KDN Logistics, LLP 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PEAPOD S&S NORTH READING, MA 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Impact Systems, LLC 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lucky Viking LLC 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maitri Genetics 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Insa Shamokin Dam 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ethos Fairless Hills 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR FIVE BELOW INC 19,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital of University of Pennsylvania 13,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Hospital 9,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Campus 9,129 FTE
NAT-TCR Denron Plumbing & HVAC, LLC - South 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR UAD 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cimpl's, LLC 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Big R of Dumas, LLC. 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Indian Lake Rehabilitation 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE White Flower Farm Morris 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE KAD Logistics LLC 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE BEC- Goose Creek Facility 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.