Advertising specialty (e.g., keychain, magnet, pen) distribution services · California

Logomark, Inc.

Tustin, CA · ~253 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Logomark, Inc. runs at 1058% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Advertising specialty (e.g., keychain, magnet, pen) distribution services workplace, earning a grade F.

Logomark, Inc.: 5.3 TCR = 1058% of Advertising specialty (e.g., keychain, magnet, pen) distribution services BLS 0.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Logomark, Inc. safety composite

Logomark, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2017→2024

Logomark, Inc. injury rate improved

Logomark, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.1 from 7.7 in 2017 to 6.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.7 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=5.0 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=6.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541890 · Tustin, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 5.3 · 1058% of ind

  • DART 6.2 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO 2904-CDS-MN
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 104 inj
  • SIZE ~253 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2904-CDS-MN (1.5 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Logomark, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Logomark, Inc. averages 5.3 TCR (1058% of the Advertising specialty (e.g., keychain, magnet, pen) distribution services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Logomark, Inc. TCR series: 2017=7.7 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=5 · 2022=3 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=6.6 · BLS 0.5

Where Logomark, Inc. falls in its industry

16 Advertising specialty (e.g., k establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Advertising specialty (e.g., k employers in California.

Logomark, Inc. (253 employees, TCR 5.3) among 11 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 12 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Retail Merchandising ServicesMajestic MarketingLee's Pro shopCastelli Magnet LLCCreative Outdoor Advertising2904-CDS-MNAdvance CorporationDimension DesignBall Pro Inc.Visual Promotions, LLCThe Image GroupLogomark, Inc.
Logomark, Inc. (253 employees, TCR 5.3) among 11 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Logomark, Inc. has more employees than the Advertising specialty (e.g., keychain, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.6 6.2 16 0 0
2023 5.4 3.6 12 0 0
2022 3.0 1.5 6 0 0
2021 5.0 5.0 9 0 0
2020 5.8 5.8 11 0 0
2019 2.7 1.5 7 0 0
2018 6.1 3.0 18 0 0
2017 7.7 5.1 25 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541890 · CA · Tustin

16 Advertising specialty (e.g., keychain, magnet, pen) distribution services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 94 employers in Tustin, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2904-CDS-MN 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advance Corporation 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Retail Merchandising Services 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Majestic Marketing 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sierra Farms, LLC 253 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frantz Nursery 253 FTE
STATE-SIZE Castaneda & Sons, Inc. 253 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mid-Coast Transit Constructors - Mid-Coast LRT Extension 253 FTE
CITY-NEAR TUSTCA70 1,036 FTE
CITY-NEAR TUSTCA70 - Pacific Bell Telephone Company 840 FTE
CITY-NEAR 738 YOUNG S MARKET-TUSTIN 765 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headquarters, CA 691 FTE
NAT-TCR Stericycle - Farmingdale,NY 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR South Kearny 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sand Springs Home 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR S07539 - Canton Hauling 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lancaster 253 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chesterfield (Mt Clemens) MFG (EF, AUTO) 253 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fujifilm Holdings America Corporation 253 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kensington Park Senior Living 253 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.