Radiator shields and enclosures, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Lancaster

Lancaster, PA · ~253 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lancaster runs at 237% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Radiator shields and enclosures, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Lancaster: 7.8 TCR = 237% of Radiator shields and enclosures, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lancaster safety composite

Lancaster scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2016→2024

Lancaster injury rate improved

Lancaster's TCR fell 4.9 from 9.2 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 20.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.2 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=20.1 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=11.8 · 2021=15.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Lancaster, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 237% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #46/68
  • PHOTO SPG International, LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 60 inj
  • SIZE ~253 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SPG International, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Lancaster in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lancaster averages 7.8 TCR (237% of the Radiator shields and enclosures, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lancaster TCR series: 2016=9.2 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=20.1 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=11.8 · 2021=15.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Lancaster falls in its industry

1,158 Radiator shields and enclosure establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 68 Radiator shields and enclosure employers in Pennsylvania.

Lancaster (253 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lancaster
Lancaster (253 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Lancaster has more employees than the Radiator shields and enclosures, sheet m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 3.8 9 1 0
2023 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 15.5 13.6 8 0 0
2020 11.8 7.9 6 0 0
2019 4.8 3.2 3 0 0
2018 20.1 10.0 22 0 0
2017 4.7 3.7 5 0 0
2016 9.2 7.6 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · PA · Lancaster

1,158 Radiator shields and enclosures, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 450 employers in Lancaster, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SPG International, LLC 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Linx 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SMT INC 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emerald Metal Products, Inc. 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tri-State Ashland 253 FTE
STATE-SIZE WIRE AND CABLE 253 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bedford 253 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rockland Manufacturing Weber Plant 253 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Health, LGH Hospital 7,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR LGHealth 7,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Hospital 6,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Medical Group 1,436 FTE
NAT-TCR Little Swedes Industries 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Climate Systems, Inc. 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Modern Ginning Company 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hannah B G Shaw Home, Inc 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chesterfield (Mt Clemens) MFG (EF, AUTO) 253 FTE
NAT-SIZE Logomark, Inc. 253 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fujifilm Holdings America Corporation 253 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kensington Park Senior Living 253 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.