Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · Texas

Lone Star Paving Company - Austin

Austin, TX · ~193 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lone Star Paving Company - Austin runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Lone Star Paving Company - Austin: 1.0 TCR = 36% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lone Star Paving Company - Austin safety composite

Lone Star Paving Company - Austin scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2018

Lone Star Paving Company - Austin injury rate improved

Lone Star Paving Company - Austin's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.6 in 2016 to 0.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.6 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #65/286
  • PHOTO Boh Bros. Constructi…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~193 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Boh Bros. Construction Co., L.L.C. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Lone Star Paving Company - Austin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lone Star Paving Company - Austin averages 1.0 TCR (36% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lone Star Paving Company - Austin TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=0.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Lone Star Paving Company - Austin falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #65 safest of 286 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in Texas.

Lone Star Paving Company - Austin (193 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Lone Star Paving Company - Austin
Lone Star Paving Company - Austin (193 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Lone Star Paving Company - Austin has more employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2017 0.9 0.9 2 0 0
2016 1.6 0.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · TX · Austin

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Boh Bros. Construction Co., L.L.C. 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR R.L. McCoy Inc. Columbia City 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Graves County Road Department 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Specialized Construction Inc 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 31041 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tellepsen Industrial 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Russell Marine LLC 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE VA Electric - San Antonio - Austin 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR HBSHSESC30 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Velociti Operational Headquarters 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR DSAR Rogers 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Customer Information Center Management 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Westin Lombard Yorktown Center 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premier Fixtures 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Orleans Pelicans 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Accredo Health Group, Inc. Memphis, TN 1620 193 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.