Natural gas pipeline construction · New Jersey

Long Branch Facility

Long Branch, NJ · ~120 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Long Branch Facility runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Natural gas pipeline construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Long Branch Facility: 2.1 TCR = 74% of Natural gas pipeline construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Long Branch Facility safety composite

Long Branch Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2021

Long Branch Facility injury rate improved

Long Branch Facility's TCR fell 1.0 from 2.0 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.0 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237120 · Long Branch, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 74% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #13/18
  • PHOTO 104176 - Astoria Fue…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~120 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 104176 - Astoria Fuel Oil Tank Farm Conversion (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Long Branch Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Long Branch Facility averages 2.1 TCR (74% of the Natural gas pipeline construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Long Branch Facility TCR series: 2016=2 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2 · 2021=1 · BLS 2.8

Where Long Branch Facility falls in its industry

809 Natural gas pipeline construct establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 18 Natural gas pipeline construct employers in New Jersey.

Long Branch Facility (120 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Long Branch Facility
Long Branch Facility (120 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Long Branch Facility has fewer employees than the Natural gas pipeline construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2020 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2019 2.6 1.7 3 0 0
2018 2.2 2.2 3 0 0
2017 2.6 1.9 4 0 0
2016 2.0 2.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237120 · NJ · Long Branch

809 Natural gas pipeline construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 14 employers in Long Branch, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 104176 - Astoria Fuel Oil Tank Farm Conversion 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR New England Utility Constructors Inc. - Neuco Massachusetts 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Danella Construction Corporation of New York 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NPL West LLC - Washington 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dobco, Inc. 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE DPR Construction - New Jersey 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Biazzo 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenhorse Media LLC 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monmouth Medical Center 1,918 FTE
CITY-NEAR Complete Care at Monmouth 175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Long Branch, JFKS Facility 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR LONG BRANCH NJ 115 FTE
NAT-TCR Glenwood Reporting Center 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 49321d - Eugene or Pec 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 44161n - Tuscaloosa 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Doosan STA 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Hca - Clear Lake Regional 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4818-FPEN 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Strack And Van Til Valparaiso North 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dudley Shoals 120 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.