General merchandise, nondurable goods, merchant wholesalers · New York

Long Island Compost Corp.

Yaphank, NY · ~70 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Long Island Compost Corp. runs at 253% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General merchandise, nondurable goods, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Long Island Compost Corp.: 5.6 TCR = 253% of General merchandise, nondurable goods, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Long Island Compost Corp. safety composite

Long Island Compost Corp. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Long Island Compost Corp.: 2.5 → 5.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 10.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.71× in 2024

Long Island Compost Corp.'s TCR rose 2.8 from 2.5 in 2016 to 5.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424990 · Yaphank, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.6 · 253% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #11/14
  • PHOTO Keefe Texas
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Keefe Texas (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Long Island Compost Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Long Island Compost Corp. averages 5.6 TCR (253% of the General merchandise, nondurable goods, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Long Island Compost Corp. TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=6.4 · 2018=10.1 · 2019=9.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=6.4 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 2.2

Where Long Island Compost Corp. falls in its industry

301 General merchandise, nondurabl establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 14 General merchandise, nondurabl employers in New York.

Long Island Compost Corp. (70 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Long Island Compost Corp.
Long Island Compost Corp. (70 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Long Island Compost Corp. has more employees than the General merchandise, nondurable goods, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 3.9 4 0 0
2023 3.7 2.5 3 0 0
2022 6.4 2.6 5 0 0
2021 6.2 6.2 5 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 9.6 7.2 7 1 0
2018 10.1 5.1 8 0 0
2017 6.4 3.8 4 1 0
2016 2.5 1.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424990 · NY · Yaphank

301 General merchandise, nondurable goods, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 21 employers in Yaphank, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Keefe Texas 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Down To Earth Judkins 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Access Securepak 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Segrest - Gibsonton 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Samascott Orchards LLC 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Westchester 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE El Sol Contracting/El Sol Ltd. Ent. JV 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Callahan Paving Corp. 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Region 109 585 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 8331 581 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8331 271 FTE
CITY-NEAR Framerica Corp 226 FTE
NAT-TCR Eastern Caisson Corporation 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Edgerton Contractors, Inc 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR TriGreen Equipment Columbia 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Grain Belt Supply Company Inc 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 050-Portland 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southwest Utility Systems Inc 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spring Valley Construction Company 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE 71 Morgan Services Indianapolis 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.