Individual and family social services, multi-purpose · Wisconsin

Lori Knapp, Inc. Ashland ILS Program

Ashland, WI · ~37 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lori Knapp, Inc. Ashland ILS Program runs at 193% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Individual and family social services, multi-purpose workplace, earning a grade D.

Lori Knapp, Inc. Ashland ILS Program: 7.3 TCR = 193% of Individual and family social services, multi-purpose BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lori Knapp, Inc. Ashland ILS Program safety composite

Lori Knapp, Inc. Ashland ILS Program scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.5

2016→2020

Lori Knapp, Inc. Ashland ILS Program injury rate improved

Lori Knapp, Inc. Ashland ILS Program's TCR fell 13.5 from 13.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 13.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.5 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=12.3 · 2019=10.8 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · Ashland, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.3 · 193% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/14
  • PHOTO Resource and Crisis …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Resource and Crisis Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Lori Knapp, Inc. Ashland ILS Program in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lori Knapp, Inc. Ashland ILS Program averages 7.3 TCR (193% of the Individual and family social services, multi-purpose BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lori Knapp, Inc. Ashland ILS Program TCR series: 2016=13.5 · 2017=0 · 2018=12.3 · 2019=10.8 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Lori Knapp, Inc. Ashland ILS Program falls in its industry

990 Individual and family social s establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 14 Individual and family social s employers in Wisconsin.

Lori Knapp, Inc. Ashland ILS Program (37 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lori Knapp, Inc. Ashland ILS Program
Lori Knapp, Inc. Ashland ILS Program (37 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Lori Knapp, Inc. Ashland ILS Program has fewer employees than the Individual and family social services, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 10.8 5.4 2 0 0
2018 12.3 6.2 1 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 13.5 13.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · WI · Ashland

990 Individual and family social services, multi-purpose employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 38 employers in Ashland, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Resource and Crisis Center 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SeaView Community Services 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Office 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR All Pointe Care, LLC 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Habelman Bros. Company 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lamers Dairy, Inc 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wissota Hydro Plant 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stevens Point 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Medical Center 458 FTE
CITY-NEAR C. G. Bretting Manufacturing Company Inc. 412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Clearing Inc. 392 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1672 247 FTE
NAT-TCR Community Catalysts San Marcos 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR LBS 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 837 Falls Church, Va 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 126 Danbury, Ct 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rocky Mountain Energy Center 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thompson Industrial Services, LLC, Division 50 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gulf Coast Marine Fabricators, Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trinity Rail Maintenance Services, Inc. Plant 4494 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.