Individual and family social services, multi-purpose · Alaska

SeaView Community Services

Seward, AK · ~48 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SeaView Community Services runs at 193% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Individual and family social services, multi-purpose workplace, earning a grade D.

SeaView Community Services: 7.3 TCR = 193% of Individual and family social services, multi-purpose BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SeaView Community Services safety composite

SeaView Community Services scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

SeaView Community Services: 5.5 → 15.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 15.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

SeaView Community Services's TCR rose 9.7 from 5.5 in 2017 to 15.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 15.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · Seward, AK ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.3 · 193% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/10
  • PHOTO Resource and Crisis …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Resource and Crisis Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alaska employers → · Look up another →

SeaView Community Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SeaView Community Services averages 7.3 TCR (193% of the Individual and family social services, multi-purpose BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SeaView Community Services TCR series: 2017=5.5 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=9.7 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=15.9 · 2023=15.2 · BLS 3.8

Where SeaView Community Services falls in its industry

990 Individual and family social s establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alaska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 10 Individual and family social s employers in Alaska.

SeaView Community Services (48 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate SeaView Community Services
SeaView Community Services (48 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

SeaView Community Services has fewer employees than the Individual and family social services, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 15.2 0.0 6 0 0
2022 15.9 0.0 7 0 0
2021 2.3 2.3 0 1 0
2020 9.7 2.4 3 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 5.5 5.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · AK · Seward

990 Individual and family social services, multi-purpose employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,558 rated employers in Alaska with headcount on file · 17 employers in Seward, AK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Resource and Crisis Center 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lori Knapp, Inc. Ashland ILS Program 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Office 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brentwood 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dept. of Natural Resources (23) 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pederson Point Plant 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anchorage AK Millwork 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lithia CJDR of Wasilla 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000110 189 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dept. of Corrections (30) 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dept. of Corrections (31) 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6400-SWY-0027-0027-02728 90 FTE
NAT-TCR International Marine Products - Los Angeles 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dickenson Community Hospital 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hedman Manufacturing 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Food City 069 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE SNL Distribution Services Corp-Denton 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Service Transport Mobile, AL 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE JT Lawn Service 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Udd 4863 (Detroit - F) 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.