Motor vehicles supplies and new parts merchant wholesalers. · California

Los Angeles PDC

Ontario, CA · ~135 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Los Angeles PDC runs at 520% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Motor vehicles supplies and new parts merchant wholesalers. workplace, earning a grade F.

Los Angeles PDC: 11.4 TCR = 520% of Motor vehicles supplies and new parts merchant wholesalers. BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Los Angeles PDC safety composite

Los Angeles PDC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2017→2024

Los Angeles PDC injury rate improved

Los Angeles PDC's TCR fell 5.3 from 13.8 in 2017 to 8.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.8 · 2018=13.2 · 2019=13.3 · 2020=13.4 · 2021=9.2 · 2022=12.3 · 2023=7.9 · 2024=8.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423120 · Ontario, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.4 · 520% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #89/108
  • PHOTO Transwest_BR 9
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 86 inj
  • SIZE ~135 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Transwest_BR 9 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Los Angeles PDC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Los Angeles PDC averages 11.4 TCR (520% of the Motor vehicles supplies and new parts merchant wholesalers. BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Los Angeles PDC TCR series: 2017=13.8 · 2018=13.2 · 2019=13.3 · 2020=13.4 · 2021=9.2 · 2022=12.3 · 2023=7.9 · 2024=8.6 · BLS 2.2

Where Los Angeles PDC falls in its industry

950 Motor vehicles supplies and ne establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #89 safest of 108 Motor vehicles supplies and ne employers in California.

Los Angeles PDC (135 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Los Angeles PDC
Los Angeles PDC (135 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Los Angeles PDC has more employees than the Motor vehicles supplies and new parts me median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.6 4.8 4 5 0
2023 7.9 7.9 4 4 0
2022 12.3 10.1 8 9 0
2021 9.2 9.2 10 3 0
2020 13.4 11.9 15 4 0
2019 13.3 10.8 11 10 0
2018 13.2 10.0 12 9 0
2017 13.8 10.0 22 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423120 · CA · Ontario

950 Motor vehicles supplies and new parts merchant wholesalers. employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Transwest_BR 9 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fast San Mateo 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parts Authority IL - Rockford 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Western Trailer Sales Co. Inc. 11.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vino Vid Inc 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Saticoy Lemon Association - Oxnard 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Shippers LP | Bakersfield Packinghouse 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Pak Avocado 135 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR White Lake Sales Branch 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Schilling Forge 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sil-Kemp, Inc 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Glaz-Tech Industries Santa Teresa 11.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Edifice LLC 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cold Spring Egg Farm Inc. 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Summers Plumbing Heating & Cooling 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hiller Phoenix 135 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.