OSB (oriented strandboard) manufacturing · Wisconsin

Louisiana-Pacific Tomahawk

Tomahawk, WI · ~143 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Louisiana-Pacific Tomahawk runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical OSB (oriented strandboard) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Louisiana-Pacific Tomahawk: 0.3 TCR = 10% of OSB (oriented strandboard) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Louisiana-Pacific Tomahawk safety composite

Louisiana-Pacific Tomahawk scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2019→2024

Louisiana-Pacific Tomahawk injury rate improved

Louisiana-Pacific Tomahawk's TCR fell 1.3 from 1.3 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321219 · Tomahawk, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 10% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Norbord Jefferson
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~143 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Norbord Jefferson (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Louisiana-Pacific Tomahawk in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Louisiana-Pacific Tomahawk averages 0.3 TCR (10% of the OSB (oriented strandboard) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Louisiana-Pacific Tomahawk TCR series: 2019=1.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Louisiana-Pacific Tomahawk falls in its industry

125 OSB (oriented strandboard) man establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 OSB (oriented strandboard) man employers in Wisconsin.

Louisiana-Pacific Tomahawk (143 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Louisiana-Pacific Tomahawk
Louisiana-Pacific Tomahawk (143 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Louisiana-Pacific Tomahawk has more employees than the OSB (oriented strandboard) manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.3 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321219 · WI · Tomahawk

125 OSB (oriented strandboard) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 18 employers in Tomahawk, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Norbord Jefferson 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Louisiana-Pacific Hayward 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Huber Engineered Woods LLC 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Louisiana-Pacific Two Harbors 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Baker Manufacturing Company LLC 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Integrity Logistics LLC 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE 537040000 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Janesville 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR TOMAHAWK, WI 434 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tomahawk Operations - Somo Facility 255 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tomahawk Operations - Kaphaem Facility 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aspirus Tomahawk Hospital 95 FTE
NAT-TCR Lungpacer Medical USA Inc 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Paradigm Construction 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pals Electric, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Town of East Windsor - Town Hall 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southland Sod Farms Operations, Inc. 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maricopa County - Air Quality (850) 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality One Woodwork LLC 143 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.