Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing · Colorado

L&R Pallet Service, Inc.

Denver, CO · ~120 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

L&R Pallet Service, Inc. runs at 253% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

L&R Pallet Service, Inc.: 8.4 TCR = 253% of Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

L&R Pallet Service, Inc. safety composite

L&R Pallet Service, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2016→2021

L&R Pallet Service, Inc. injury rate improved

L&R Pallet Service, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.5 from 8.0 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.0 · 2017=12.1 · 2018=12.3 · 2019=9.9 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · Denver, CO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 253% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #4/7
  • PHOTO Kamps Pallets Charlo…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 61 inj
  • SIZE ~120 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kamps Pallets Charlotte Plant 1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

L&R Pallet Service, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows L&R Pallet Service, Inc. averages 8.4 TCR (253% of the Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

L&R Pallet Service, Inc. TCR series: 2016=8 · 2017=12.1 · 2018=12.3 · 2019=9.9 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=3.5 · BLS 3.3

Where L&R Pallet Service, Inc. falls in its industry

952 Pallets, wood or wood and meta establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 7 Pallets, wood or wood and meta employers in Colorado.

L&R Pallet Service, Inc. (120 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate L&R Pallet Service, Inc.
L&R Pallet Service, Inc. (120 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

L&R Pallet Service, Inc. has more employees than the Pallets, wood or wood and metal combinat median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.5 3.5 4 0 0
2020 4.3 4.3 5 0 0
2019 9.9 9.9 13 0 0
2018 12.3 12.3 16 0 0
2017 12.1 12.1 14 1 0
2016 8.0 7.2 9 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · CO · Denver

952 Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 1,757 employers in Denver, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kamps Pallets Charlotte Plant 1 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Millwood, Inc. Dundee 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Van Voorst Lumber 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corry PA 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mountain Prairie 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE CML Security, LLC. 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brinkman Construction 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7102103 FPL Neptune 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN DEN 9,832 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-DEN 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN - Airport United Airlines Offices 5,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR CO-01 4,581 FTE
NAT-TCR Markman Peat 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Maverick Grand Prairie, TX 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 0068 - Salem or Whse 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Miles Nursery, Inc. 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE TPC Group - Port Neches Operations 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Horschel Brothers Precision, LLC 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Doubletree Hilton Flagstaff 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE RGB- Tempe 120 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.