Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · Colorado

Samtec Microelectronics

Colorado Springs, CO · ~120 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Samtec Microelectronics runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Samtec Microelectronics: 1.3 TCR = 39% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Samtec Microelectronics safety composite

Samtec Microelectronics scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2017→2024

Samtec Microelectronics injury rate improved

Samtec Microelectronics's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.8 in 2017 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.8 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=1.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · Colorado Springs, CO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 39% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK P60
  • PHOTO AirBorn, Interconnect
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~120 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AirBorn, Interconnect (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Samtec Microelectronics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Samtec Microelectronics averages 1.3 TCR (39% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Samtec Microelectronics TCR series: 2017=1.8 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=1.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Samtec Microelectronics falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Samtec Microelectronics (120 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Samtec Microelectronics
Samtec Microelectronics (120 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Samtec Microelectronics has fewer employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2019 2.8 1.9 3 0 0
2018 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.8 1.8 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · CO · Colorado Springs

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AirBorn, Interconnect 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Airborn, Inc. (Georgetown) 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teledyne Reynolds 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plastics One, Inc 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mountain Prairie 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE CML Security, LLC. 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brinkman Construction 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7102103 FPL Neptune 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR Western National Builders 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fujifilm North America Corporation- Greenwood, SC 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR TurbinePROs Main Office 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Traverse City MI Yard 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE DPR Construction - New Jersey 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston Branch 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Agoura 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mission Valley 120 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.