Guardrail construction · Pennsylvania

L.S. Lee, Inc./PA Construction

York, PA · ~58 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

L.S. Lee, Inc./PA Construction runs at 557% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Guardrail construction workplace, earning a grade F.

L.S. Lee, Inc./PA Construction: 15.6 TCR = 557% of Guardrail construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

L.S. Lee, Inc./PA Construction safety composite

L.S. Lee, Inc./PA Construction scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 19.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

L.S. Lee, Inc./PA Construction: 13.2 → 21.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 26.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.25× in 2024

L.S. Lee, Inc./PA Construction's TCR rose 8.0 from 13.2 in 2016 to 21.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 26.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · York, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.6 · 557% of ind

  • DART 19.5 DART
  • RANK #193/196
  • PHOTO RMA Terra Bella Rd Y…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 75 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RMA Terra Bella Rd Yard (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

L.S. Lee, Inc./PA Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows L.S. Lee, Inc./PA Construction averages 15.6 TCR (557% of the Guardrail construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

L.S. Lee, Inc./PA Construction TCR series: 2016=13.2 · 2017=13.3 · 2018=14 · 2019=12.5 · 2020=11.6 · 2021=26.4 · 2022=15.3 · 2023=12.8 · 2024=21.2 · BLS 2.8

Where L.S. Lee, Inc./PA Construction falls in its industry

4,078 Guardrail construction establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #193 safest of 196 Guardrail construction employers in Pennsylvania.

L.S. Lee, Inc./PA Construction (58 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate L.S. Lee, Inc./PA Construction
L.S. Lee, Inc./PA Construction (58 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

L.S. Lee, Inc./PA Construction has fewer employees than the Guardrail construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 21.2 19.5 12 0 0
2023 12.8 11.0 7 0 0
2022 15.3 15.3 8 0 0
2021 26.4 18.3 13 0 0
2020 11.6 6.7 7 0 0
2019 12.5 7.8 6 2 0
2018 14.0 8.7 6 2 0
2017 13.3 13.3 8 0 0
2016 13.2 5.9 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · PA · York

4,078 Guardrail construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 496 employers in York, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RMA Terra Bella Rd Yard 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Works - Streets amd Roads 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR D9 Marion Yard 15.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brunalli 15.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Menu Mate Mushroom Farm 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE CannTech 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE PA Location 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Moyer's Hatchery 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellSpan York Hospital 4,886 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellSpan Medical Group 4,293 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wellspan Health 2,591 FTE
CITY-NEAR FedEx Supply Chain (Target York) 1,875 FTE
NAT-TCR Artis Senior Living of Evesham 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Commercial Roofing & Contracting, Inc. 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hibbard Skilled Nursing Center 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Stoughton Trailers LLC. 15.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Flatonia Farm Plant 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Hoosier Company, Inc. 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMC Impact Metals Pell City 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE VDF Crown Point 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.