Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation · New York

LSC Long Island City Support Center

Lic, NY · ~1,376 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

LSC Long Island City Support Center runs at 2% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade A.

LSC Long Island City Support Center: 0.1 TCR = 2% of Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

LSC Long Island City Support Center safety composite

LSC Long Island City Support Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

84/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

LSC Long Island City Support Center held a steady TCR band

LSC Long Island City Support Center's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.1 · 2017=0.1 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.1 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Lic, NY AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 2% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/73
  • PHOTO SSC - Salt Lake Supp…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~1,376 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SSC - Salt Lake Support Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

LSC Long Island City Support Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows LSC Long Island City Support Center averages 0.1 TCR (2% of the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

LSC Long Island City Support Center TCR series: 2016=0.1 · 2017=0.1 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.1 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where LSC Long Island City Support Center falls in its industry

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 73 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp employers in New York.

LSC Long Island City Support Center (1,376 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate LSC Long Island City Support Center
LSC Long Island City Support Center (1,376 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

LSC Long Island City Support Center has more employees than the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.2 0.2 2 0 0
2022 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2021 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2018 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2016 0.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · NY · Lic

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SSC - Salt Lake Support Center 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR HQ 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9006-90060006 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2073-SW-20730011-FO 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Estee Lauder - 350 SSR 1,375 FTE
STATE-SIZE Catholic Health Corporate 1,374 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valatie Family Care Center 1,373 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Spine Institute of Columbia Memorial 1,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sirona Dental Inc. 65 FTE
NAT-TCR Londonderry 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR International Division 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate - 01 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodall 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Honeywell 1,376 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adventist Medical Center-Portland 1,376 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Elizabeth's Hospital, OFallon 1,376 FTE
NAT-SIZE Solo Cup Company Chicago 1,377 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.