Reconstituted Wood Product Manufacturing · Iowa

Lumber Specialties - Dyersville Wall Panel

Dyersville, IA · ~42 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
26.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lumber Specialties - Dyersville Wall Panel runs at 812% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Reconstituted Wood Product Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Lumber Specialties - Dyersville Wall Panel: 26.8 TCR = 812% of Reconstituted Wood Product Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lumber Specialties - Dyersville Wall Panel safety composite

Lumber Specialties - Dyersville Wall Panel scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 26.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 20.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2021

Lumber Specialties - Dyersville Wall Panel injury rate improved

Lumber Specialties - Dyersville Wall Panel's TCR fell 0.4 from 22.6 in 2016 to 22.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 36.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=22.6 · 2017=23.4 · 2018=36.5 · 2019=30.2 · 2020=25.8 · 2021=22.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321219 · Dyersville, IA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 26.8 · 812% of ind

  • DART 20.6 DART
  • RANK P0
  • PHOTO Maine Woods Pellet C…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 72 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maine Woods Pellet Company LLC (6.7 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Lumber Specialties - Dyersville Wall Panel in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lumber Specialties - Dyersville Wall Panel averages 26.8 TCR (812% of the Reconstituted Wood Product Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lumber Specialties - Dyersville Wall Panel TCR series: 2016=22.6 · 2017=23.4 · 2018=36.5 · 2019=30.2 · 2020=25.8 · 2021=22.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Lumber Specialties - Dyersville Wall Panel falls in its industry

125 Reconstituted Wood Product Man establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Lumber Specialties - Dyersville Wall Panel (42 employees, TCR 26.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Lumber Specialties - Dyersville Wall Panel
Lumber Specialties - Dyersville Wall Panel (42 employees, TCR 26.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Lumber Specialties - Dyersville Wall Panel has fewer employees than the Reconstituted Wood Product Manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 22.3 20.6 13 0 0
2020 25.8 19.9 13 0 0
2019 30.2 20.9 13 0 0
2018 36.5 20.1 20 0 0
2017 23.4 10.0 6 1 0
2016 22.6 12.9 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321219 · IA · Dyersville

125 Reconstituted Wood Product Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 28 employers in Dyersville, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maine Woods Pellet Company LLC 20.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Towanda 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Applegate Arizona, LLC 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inca Sardis 10.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Centrum Valley West 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE ICF Goldfield 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6728-00030023-33 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc - Dysart SPSC 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dyersville Store 575 FTE
CITY-NEAR IA ESAPCO 265 FTE
CITY-NEAR Modernfold 220 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lumber Specialties - Dyersville Truss 171 FTE
NAT-TCR The Residence at Cedar Dell 26.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Longs Peak Dairy LLC GALETON 26.8 TCR
NAT-TCR iFLY DCVA 26.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 527 ABC Supply Co., inc. 26.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hobart Service, Miami 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gem Auto Parts Co, Inc. 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Field - NYRP 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pyramid Masonry Contractors, FL 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.