Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Massachusetts

The Residence at Cedar Dell

Dartmouth, MA · ~85 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
26.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Residence at Cedar Dell runs at 706% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Residence at Cedar Dell: 26.8 TCR = 706% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Residence at Cedar Dell safety composite

The Residence at Cedar Dell scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 26.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Residence at Cedar Dell: 13.7 → 18.5 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 47.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

The Residence at Cedar Dell's TCR rose 4.8 from 13.7 in 2016 to 18.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 47.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Dartmouth, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 26.8 · 706% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #80/80
  • PHOTO Canterbury Gardens
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 80 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Canterbury Gardens (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

The Residence at Cedar Dell in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Residence at Cedar Dell averages 26.8 TCR (706% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Residence at Cedar Dell TCR series: 2016=13.7 · 2017=15.5 · 2018=18 · 2019=30.6 · 2020=35.7 · 2021=47.9 · 2022=20.9 · 2023=40.5 · 2024=18.5 · BLS 3.8

Where The Residence at Cedar Dell falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #80 safest of 80 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

The Residence at Cedar Dell (85 employees, TCR 26.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate The Residence at Cedar Dell
The Residence at Cedar Dell (85 employees, TCR 26.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Residence at Cedar Dell has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 18.5 0.0 7 2 0
2023 40.5 36.2 4 15 0
2022 20.9 6.3 10 0 0
2021 47.9 25.1 10 11 0
2020 35.7 18.9 11 6 0
2019 30.6 6.1 15 0 0
2018 18.0 4.0 8 1 0
2017 15.5 5.8 8 0 0
2016 13.7 5.9 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MA · Dartmouth

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 25 employers in Dartmouth, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Canterbury Gardens 26.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regency Fallbrook 26.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vintage Knolls 26.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Autumn Leaves LCS 26.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE IPS - Integrated Project Services, LLC - Cardinal 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE BlueHive/Continental Woodcraft 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE 90003930 Canal 3 Simple Cycle Project 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE NA-US-MA-Wilmington- Research Drive 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southcoast Behavioral Hospital 335 FTE
CITY-NEAR MADAR - DARTMOUTH 216 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAI-0033-0033-00619 FAC-00619-NORTH DARTMOUTH-MA 203 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-000000619 199 FTE
NAT-TCR Longs Peak Dairy LLC GALETON 26.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lumber Specialties - Dyersville Wall Panel 26.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 2ndtonone Logistics LLC 26.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Half Day School 26.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 706 Bloomington 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE 124 Cottleville 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Electrostatics Corporation 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kirkwood 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.