Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing · Florida

Luminar Technologies, Inc.

Orlando, FL · ~251 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Luminar Technologies, Inc. runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Luminar Technologies, Inc.: 0.5 TCR = 14% of Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Luminar Technologies, Inc. safety composite

Luminar Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Luminar Technologies, Inc.: 0.0 → 1.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.83× in 2024

Luminar Technologies, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.2 from 0.0 in 2019 to 1.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Orlando, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #12/38
  • PHOTO Leonardo DRS Land Sy…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~251 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Leonardo DRS Land Systems - St. Louis (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Luminar Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Luminar Technologies, Inc. averages 0.5 TCR (14% of the Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Luminar Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Luminar Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

388 Search and detection systems a establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 38 Search and detection systems a employers in Florida.

Luminar Technologies, Inc. (251 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Luminar Technologies, Inc.
Luminar Technologies, Inc. (251 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Luminar Technologies, Inc. has more employees than the Search and detection systems and instrum median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 0.4 3 0 0
2023 0.6 0.6 2 0 0
2022 0.7 0.7 2 0 0
2021 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · FL · Orlando

388 Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Leonardo DRS Land Systems - St. Louis 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Gilbert AZ (1390) 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nashua, NH 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockwell Collins Inc (Richardson TX ) 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mitchell & Stark Construction Co., Inc. (FL Division) 251 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cutrale Citrus Juices USA, Inc. - Auburndale, FL 251 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Nuclear - Florida 251 FTE
STATE-SIZE DePuy Synthes Power Tools Palm Beach Gardens 251 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR CP Rankin, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Vante 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Office 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 07007-07-CORPORATE-GROUP 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fox Hill Village Homeowners Corporation 251 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA San Francisco 780 McDonnell Rd FI3 251 FTE
NAT-SIZE 130 - Santa Clara County Ca 251 FTE
NAT-SIZE Golden Age 251 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.