Masonry pointing, cleaning or caulking · New York

Lupini Construction, LLC

Utica, NY · ~83 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lupini Construction, LLC runs at 182% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Masonry pointing, cleaning or caulking workplace, earning a grade D.

Lupini Construction, LLC: 5.1 TCR = 182% of Masonry pointing, cleaning or caulking BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lupini Construction, LLC safety composite

Lupini Construction, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.6

2016→2024

Lupini Construction, LLC injury rate improved

Lupini Construction, LLC's TCR fell 7.6 from 12.1 in 2016 to 4.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.1 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238140 · Utica, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 182% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #19/29
  • PHOTO Alliance Masonry Corp.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alliance Masonry Corp. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Lupini Construction, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lupini Construction, LLC averages 5.1 TCR (182% of the Masonry pointing, cleaning or caulking BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lupini Construction, LLC TCR series: 2016=12.1 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=4.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Lupini Construction, LLC falls in its industry

703 Masonry pointing, cleaning or establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 29 Masonry pointing, cleaning or employers in New York.

Lupini Construction, LLC (83 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Lupini Construction, LLC
Lupini Construction, LLC (83 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Lupini Construction, LLC has more employees than the Masonry pointing, cleaning or caulking median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.5 3.0 3 0 0
2023 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2022 2.9 1.5 2 0 0
2021 8.2 8.2 6 0 0
2020 2.9 2.9 1 1 0
2019 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2018 3.7 3.7 3 0 0
2017 3.8 3.8 3 0 0
2016 12.1 8.7 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238140 · NY · Utica

703 Masonry pointing, cleaning or caulking employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 148 employers in Utica, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alliance Masonry Corp. 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Del's Masonry, Inc. 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stoney Masonry, Inc. 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR fssH 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Willow Bend Farm 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE NYSEG Plattsburgh 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE 59th Street Generating Station 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE QUEENS SERVICE CENTER-NY71 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Resource Center for Independent Living 3,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faxton St. Lukes 1,727 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Elizabeth Medical Center 1,324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utica University 915 FTE
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #133 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Enterprise 5423 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mrc Creekside 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bradington YOung Furniture 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Superior Roofing, Inc. 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willow Crossing Health & Rehabilitation Center 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE T&H Electrical Corp. 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #0063 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.