Lenses, ophthalmic, manufacturing · Georgia

Luxottica Atlanta Distribution and Manufacturing

Mcdonough, GA · ~727 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Luxottica Atlanta Distribution and Manufacturing runs at 144% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Lenses, ophthalmic, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Luxottica Atlanta Distribution and Manufacturing: 4.8 TCR = 144% of Lenses, ophthalmic, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Luxottica Atlanta Distribution and Manufacturing safety composite

Luxottica Atlanta Distribution and Manufacturing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Luxottica Atlanta Distribution and Manufacturing: 4.1 → 5.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 5.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.85× in 2017

Luxottica Atlanta Distribution and Manufacturing's TCR rose 1.3 from 4.1 in 2016 to 5.4 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339115 · Mcdonough, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 144% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #9/9
  • PHOTO Omega Dallas
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 90 inj
  • SIZE ~727 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Omega Dallas (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Luxottica Atlanta Distribution and Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Luxottica Atlanta Distribution and Manufacturing averages 4.8 TCR (144% of the Lenses, ophthalmic, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Luxottica Atlanta Distribution and Manufacturing TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2017=5.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Luxottica Atlanta Distribution and Manufacturing falls in its industry

135 Lenses, ophthalmic, manufactur establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 9 Lenses, ophthalmic, manufactur employers in Georgia.

Luxottica Atlanta Distribution and Manufacturing (727 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Luxottica Atlanta Distribution and Manufacturing
Luxottica Atlanta Distribution and Manufacturing (727 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Luxottica Atlanta Distribution and Manufacturing has more employees than the Lenses, ophthalmic, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 5.4 4.0 71 0 0
2016 4.1 3.7 19 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339115 · GA · Mcdonough

135 Lenses, ophthalmic, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 157 employers in Mcdonough, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Omega Dallas 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR VSPOne Olympia 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Visionworks (Manufacturing and Distribution) Schertz 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Optogenics 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE SSB Headquarters Doraville 727 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goodwill staffing csra 728 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - SAV7 729 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mannington Mills, Inc 724 FTE
CITY-NEAR Luxottica Distribution and Manufacturing 1,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR McDonough, DC 827 FTE
CITY-NEAR PVH Corporation 761 FTE
CITY-NEAR Georgia Crown Distributing Co. 534 FTE
NAT-TCR 0283 - Valrico, Fl 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunshine Mills Tupelo, MS 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #5206 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Continental Datalabel Elgin 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lakewood Regional Support Bldg 727 FTE
NAT-SIZE 054521-La Intl Svc Ctr 727 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arjo Inc. 727 FTE
NAT-SIZE King County Community & Human Services 727 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.