Eyes, glass and plastics, manufacturing · Georgia

Luxottica Distribution and Manufacturing

Mcdonough, GA · ~1,650 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Luxottica Distribution and Manufacturing runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Eyes, glass and plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Luxottica Distribution and Manufacturing: 2.4 TCR = 74% of Eyes, glass and plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Luxottica Distribution and Manufacturing safety composite

Luxottica Distribution and Manufacturing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2017→2023

Luxottica Distribution and Manufacturing injury rate improved

Luxottica Distribution and Manufacturing's TCR fell 4.7 from 5.4 in 2017 to 0.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.4 · 2018=3.1 · 2020=2.0 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339115 · Mcdonough, GA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 74% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #7/9
  • PHOTO Duffens Optical
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 196 inj
  • SIZE ~1,650 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Duffens Optical (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Luxottica Distribution and Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Luxottica Distribution and Manufacturing averages 2.4 TCR (74% of the Eyes, glass and plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Luxottica Distribution and Manufacturing TCR series: 2017=5.4 · 2018=3.1 · 2020=2 · 2022=1 · 2023=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Luxottica Distribution and Manufacturing falls in its industry

135 Eyes, glass and plastics, manu establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 9 Eyes, glass and plastics, manu employers in Georgia.

Luxottica Distribution and Manufacturing (1,650 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Luxottica Distribution and Manufacturing
Luxottica Distribution and Manufacturing (1,650 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Luxottica Distribution and Manufacturing has more employees than the Eyes, glass and plastics, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.7 0.5 13 0 0
2022 1.0 0.6 20 0 0
2020 2.0 1.7 32 1 0
2018 3.1 2.5 60 0 0
2017 5.4 4.0 71 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339115 · GA · Mcdonough

135 Eyes, glass and plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 157 employers in Mcdonough, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Duffens Optical 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CooperVision Scottsville 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walman Instruments 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walman - Corporate 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Camilla Plant 1,658 FTE
STATE-SIZE LOCATION 20027 1,640 FTE
STATE-SIZE TSV Augusta East 1,638 FTE
STATE-SIZE Six Flags Over Georgia 1,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR McDonough, DC 827 FTE
CITY-NEAR PVH Corporation 761 FTE
CITY-NEAR Luxottica Atlanta Distribution and Manufacturing 727 FTE
CITY-NEAR Georgia Crown Distributing Co. 534 FTE
NAT-TCR Shield Packaging of California 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ashley Pointe Hospitality 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ERA Industries, Inc. - Wheeling 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Location 1- Manufacturing 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bwi-Ground Ops 1,650 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - ONT2 1,650 FTE
NAT-SIZE ThedaCare Regional Medical Center Appleton 1,649 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clinic 1,651 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.