Lumber, Plywood, Millwork, and Wood Panel Merchant Wholesalers · Wisconsin

Lyman Lumber Wisconsin

Eau Claire, WI · ~37 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lyman Lumber Wisconsin runs at 250% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Lumber, Plywood, Millwork, and Wood Panel Merchant Wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Lyman Lumber Wisconsin: 5.5 TCR = 250% of Lumber, Plywood, Millwork, and Wood Panel Merchant Wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lyman Lumber Wisconsin safety composite

Lyman Lumber Wisconsin scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lyman Lumber Wisconsin: 6.4 → 7.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 8.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.39× in 2022

Lyman Lumber Wisconsin's TCR rose 1.3 from 6.4 in 2017 to 7.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423310 · Eau Claire, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.5 · 250% of ind

  • DART 7.7 DART
  • RANK #20/46
  • PHOTO UBI PRODUCTS
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UBI PRODUCTS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Lyman Lumber Wisconsin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lyman Lumber Wisconsin averages 5.5 TCR (250% of the Lumber, Plywood, Millwork, and Wood Panel Merchant Wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lyman Lumber Wisconsin TCR series: 2017=6.4 · 2018=3 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=7.7 · BLS 2.2

Where Lyman Lumber Wisconsin falls in its industry

1,225 Lumber, Plywood, Millwork, and establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 46 Lumber, Plywood, Millwork, and employers in Wisconsin.

Lyman Lumber Wisconsin (37 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100120 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lyman Lumber Wisconsin
Lyman Lumber Wisconsin (37 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Lyman Lumber Wisconsin has fewer employees than the Lumber, Plywood, Millwork, and Wood Pane median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.7 7.7 3 0 0
2021 5.2 2.6 2 0 0
2020 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 8.4 5.6 3 0 0
2018 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2017 6.4 6.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423310 · WI · Eau Claire

1,225 Lumber, Plywood, Millwork, and Wood Panel Merchant Wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 271 employers in Eau Claire, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR UBI PRODUCTS 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tucker Door & Trim LLC 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Builders Choice Lumber LLC 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MacDonald & Owen Sparta 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Habelman Bros. Company 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lamers Dairy, Inc 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wissota Hydro Plant 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stevens Point 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Precision Pipeline, LLC 3,757 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Eau Claire Hospital (Whipple) 3,141 FTE
CITY-NEAR WWD Sacred Heart Hospital 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR STORE DIVISION ADMIN - 3019 900 FTE
NAT-TCR Dillon's Bus Service 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mankato Packaging 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1403 WILMINGTON, NC 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Continental Tire - Allentown. (SMRU12845) 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 44975 - Raleigh Fac. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 42939 - Cleveland Joint Fac. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 44915 - Miami Fac. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 49851 - San Diego Mega Fac. 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.