Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Lytton Gardens II

Palo Alto, CA · ~23 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lytton Gardens II runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Lytton Gardens II: 2.6 TCR = 69% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lytton Gardens II safety composite

Lytton Gardens II scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lytton Gardens II: 0.0 → 5.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 5.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

Lytton Gardens II's TCR rose 5.5 from 0.0 in 2017 to 5.5 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Palo Alto, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 69% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #36/635
  • PHOTO BRAND-SLMS-SC BRANDON
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BRAND-SLMS-SC BRANDON (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Lytton Gardens II in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lytton Gardens II averages 2.6 TCR (69% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lytton Gardens II TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=5 · 2019=0 · 2020=5.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Lytton Gardens II falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Lytton Gardens II (23 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Lytton Gardens II
Lytton Gardens II (23 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Lytton Gardens II has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 5.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Palo Alto

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 116 employers in Palo Alto, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BRAND-SLMS-SC BRANDON 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodhaven Court 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10481 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avalon of Auburn Hills 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE James Diedrich Farms 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-Fanucchi Farms,LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAN2 - 04 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kyer Farms 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stanford Health Care 16,371 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Palo Alto-Deer Creek-Office 1,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Varian, Palo Alto 1,396 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-10110) 1,227 FTE
NAT-TCR 2080-Matthews, MO 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Riverhead Automall Ltd 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR LCR Contractors, LLC 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 1428 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE NRG Reliant Services 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Steel & Alloy McDonald 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2557-Arlington, WI 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE WFS_ATL 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.