Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Woodhaven Court

Albemarle, NC · ~49 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Woodhaven Court runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Woodhaven Court: 2.6 TCR = 68% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Woodhaven Court safety composite

Woodhaven Court scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2024

Woodhaven Court injury rate improved

Woodhaven Court's TCR fell 2.6 from 2.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=9.2 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Albemarle, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 68% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #46/356
  • PHOTO 10481
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 10481 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Woodhaven Court in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Woodhaven Court averages 2.6 TCR (68% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Woodhaven Court TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=9.2 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Woodhaven Court falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Woodhaven Court (49 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Woodhaven Court
Woodhaven Court (49 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Woodhaven Court has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 9.2 4.6 2 2 0
2019 4.4 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2016 2.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Albemarle

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 55 employers in Albemarle, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 10481 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avalon of Auburn Hills 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lytton Gardens II 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR BRAND-SLMS-SC BRANDON 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Zackly Rite Farms 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor's Nursery-Raleigh 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Butterball Hatchery # 3 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Matthews Operations Center 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1113-Atrium Health Stanly (1113) 555 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Stanly 546 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0040-CHS Stanly 542 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michelin Aircraft Tire Company 406 FTE
NAT-TCR BRENTWOOD-NY30 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Petrochem Materials Innovation, LLC 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Center for Employment Training 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Petaluma Plant 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE City Hall 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kalispel Linen Services 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE 70712 Capstone Dollar Tree Sp Cowpens 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wrex Products of Chico inc. 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.