Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) · South Carolina

M. B. Kahn M. B. Kahn Div

Columbia, SC · ~21 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

M. B. Kahn M. B. Kahn Div runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) workplace, earning a grade A.

M. B. Kahn M. B. Kahn Div: 0.6 TCR = 19% of Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

M. B. Kahn M. B. Kahn Div safety composite

M. B. Kahn M. B. Kahn Div scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2016→2022

M. B. Kahn M. B. Kahn Div injury rate improved

M. B. Kahn M. B. Kahn Div's TCR fell 3.3 from 3.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Columbia, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/37
  • PHOTO AP Gulf States, Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AP Gulf States, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

M. B. Kahn M. B. Kahn Div in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows M. B. Kahn M. B. Kahn Div averages 0.6 TCR (19% of the Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

M. B. Kahn M. B. Kahn Div TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.9

Where M. B. Kahn M. B. Kahn Div falls in its industry

4,692 Warehouse construction (e.g., establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 37 Warehouse construction (e.g., employers in South Carolina.

M. B. Kahn M. B. Kahn Div (21 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate M. B. Kahn M. B. Kahn Div
M. B. Kahn M. B. Kahn Div (21 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

M. B. Kahn M. B. Kahn Div has fewer employees than the Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · SC · Columbia

4,692 Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 542 employers in Columbia, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AP Gulf States, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phoenix Office 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Loberg Construction Co. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Competitive Edge Partners & Consulting, LLC 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jocassee Hydro 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE BEC - Awendaw Facility 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anderson Regional Joint Water System 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cely Construction Company, Inc. 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Health Richland 5,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prisma Health Richland 4,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Carolina Department of Transportation 4,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC Department of Transportation 3,864 FTE
NAT-TCR Corporate Records 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ExxonMobil Billings Refinery 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Iconma, L.L.C. 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE River Hills Dental 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dickenson County Ambulance Service Inc 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE C & C Directional Boring, LLC 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Safco Products - Kennesaw, GA 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.