Electric power generation, hydroelectric · Pennsylvania

NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station

New Florence, PA · ~73 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, hydroelectric workplace, earning a grade A.

NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station: 0.6 TCR = 46% of Electric power generation, hydroelectric BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station safety composite

NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station: 0.0 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 2.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2.49× in 2022

NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station's TCR rose 2.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 2.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221111 · New Florence, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 46% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK P88
  • PHOTO Eagle Creek Renewabl…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eagle Creek Renewable Energy (Combined) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station averages 0.6 TCR (46% of the Electric power generation, hydroelectric BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=2.8 · BLS 1.2

Where NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station falls in its industry

129 Electric power generation, hyd establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station (73 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station
NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station (73 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3

NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station has more employees than the Electric power generation, hydroelectric median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.8 1.4 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221111 · PA · New Florence

129 Electric power generation, hydroelectric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 7 employers in New Florence, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eagle Creek Renewable Energy (Combined) 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aiken Substation/Transmission 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR RG&E East Ave 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant Victor Daniel MPC1820 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE McMurray Operations 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Philly Schuylkill 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wohlsen Construction Self Perform 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Concrete Cutting Systems, Inc. 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Conemaugh Generating Station 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR D&K Business Management, LLC dba Lodestar Bus Lines, Ligonier Division 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Seward Operating, LLC 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR 96920032-4 TRI-COUNTY TRANSPORTATION-UNITED 33 FTE
NAT-TCR ExxonMobil Billings Refinery 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR M. B. Kahn M. B. Kahn Div 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Records 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Perry Builders Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE FRP Sheet Metal Contracting Corp 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Energy Industries - Ronkonkoma 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE DiTomaso, Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE AmRad Manufacturing LLC 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.