Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Mississippi

M1 Support Services Columbus AFB, MS

Columbus Afb, MS · ~526 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

M1 Support Services Columbus AFB, MS runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade B.

M1 Support Services Columbus AFB, MS: 3.4 TCR = 76% of Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

M1 Support Services Columbus AFB, MS safety composite

M1 Support Services Columbus AFB, MS scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2022→2024

M1 Support Services Columbus AFB, MS injury rate improved

M1 Support Services Columbus AFB, MS's TCR fell 0.7 from 3.7 in 2022 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.7 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Columbus Afb, MS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.4 · 76% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #6/10
  • PHOTO IND
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~526 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: IND (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

M1 Support Services Columbus AFB, MS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows M1 Support Services Columbus AFB, MS averages 3.4 TCR (76% of the Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

M1 Support Services Columbus AFB, MS TCR series: 2022=3.7 · 2024=3 · BLS 4.5

Where M1 Support Services Columbus AFB, MS falls in its industry

992 Maintenance and repair service establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 10 Maintenance and repair service employers in Mississippi.

M1 Support Services Columbus AFB, MS (526 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate M1 Support Services Columbus AFB, MS
M1 Support Services Columbus AFB, MS (526 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

M1 Support Services Columbus AFB, MS has more employees than the Maintenance and repair services, aircraf median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 1.9 13 0 0
2022 3.7 2.8 19 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · MS · Columbus Afb

992 Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 4 employers in Columbus Afb, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR IND 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aviation Trechnical Services Kansass City 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR HRG Aerostructures LLC 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MHI RJ Aviation Inc. - West Virginia Air Center 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Baxter Healthcare Cleveland MS 529 FTE
STATE-SIZE Howard Industries Inc (Delphi) 532 FTE
STATE-SIZE LaZBoy 535 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big M Transportation, Inc. 537 FTE
CITY-NEAR 172 - COLUMBUS AFB, MS 579 FTE
CITY-NEAR 172 - COLUMBUS AFB 571 FTE
CITY-NEAR 418 467 FTE
NAT-TCR Nova Bus (US) Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Professional Plating 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR BRT Extrusions Inc 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR OH201 West Chester - Trey 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Home Chef - Bedford Park 526 FTE
NAT-SIZE LONG Building Technologies 526 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tuscaloosa Processing 526 FTE
NAT-SIZE JH Associate Management LLC 526 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.