Farm labor contractors · California

MA Medina Farm Labor Services, Inc

Bakersfield, CA · ~770 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MA Medina Farm Labor Services, Inc runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Farm labor contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

MA Medina Farm Labor Services, Inc: 2.5 TCR = 55% of Farm labor contractors BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MA Medina Farm Labor Services, Inc safety composite

MA Medina Farm Labor Services, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

MA Medina Farm Labor Services, Inc held a steady TCR band

MA Medina Farm Labor Services, Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 1.8 in 2018 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.8 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115115 · Bakersfield, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 55% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #173/620
  • PHOTO 7 Contracting Inc
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 121 inj
  • SIZE ~770 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 7 Contracting Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

MA Medina Farm Labor Services, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MA Medina Farm Labor Services, Inc averages 2.5 TCR (55% of the Farm labor contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MA Medina Farm Labor Services, Inc TCR series: 2018=1.8 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 4.5

Where MA Medina Farm Labor Services, Inc falls in its industry

836 Farm labor contractors establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #173 safest of 620 Farm labor contractors employers in California.

MA Medina Farm Labor Services, Inc (770 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate MA Medina Farm Labor Services, Inc
MA Medina Farm Labor Services, Inc (770 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4

MA Medina Farm Labor Services, Inc has more employees than the Farm labor contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.9 10 0 0
2023 3.8 2.1 21 1 0
2022 1.5 0.1 9 1 0
2021 3.6 2.0 27 1 0
2020 2.4 1.4 21 0 0
2019 2.3 1.1 16 3 0
2018 1.8 1.3 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115115 · CA · Bakersfield

836 Farm labor contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 818 employers in Bakersfield, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 7 Contracting Inc 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR S & S HARVEST INC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR G4 Farm Labor, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR FALKNER FARMS 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE JERRY'S FLC, INC. 770 FTE
STATE-SIZE Orange County/ Los Angeles 770 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lionsgate Entertainment- 2700 Colorado 770 FTE
STATE-SIZE 04-SA 771 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA Bakersfield 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-04 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BFL1 4,113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Esparza Enterprises, Inc 3,267 FTE
NAT-TCR Magnum Construction 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Viking SupplyNet & Fabrication Services - Nashville 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Stryker Medical 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR JT Gardner, Inc. DBA Curry Printing 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 004-Nike Air Manufacturing Missouri 770 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mayco Sterling Heights 770 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pepperidge Farm, Inc. 770 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orgill Corporate Office 770 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.