Metal cutting machine tools manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Machined Metals Manufacturing

Collegeville, PA · ~36 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Machined Metals Manufacturing runs at 156% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Metal cutting machine tools manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Machined Metals Manufacturing: 5.1 TCR = 156% of Metal cutting machine tools manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Machined Metals Manufacturing safety composite

Machined Metals Manufacturing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Machined Metals Manufacturing: 7.8 → 8.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 11.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.53× in 2024

Machined Metals Manufacturing's TCR rose 0.5 from 7.8 in 2016 to 8.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 11.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · Collegeville, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 156% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #19/23
  • PHOTO Church Metal Spinning
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Church Metal Spinning (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Machined Metals Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Machined Metals Manufacturing averages 5.1 TCR (156% of the Metal cutting machine tools manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Machined Metals Manufacturing TCR series: 2016=7.8 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=11.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=8.1 · 2024=8.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Machined Metals Manufacturing falls in its industry

391 Metal cutting machine tools ma establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 23 Metal cutting machine tools ma employers in Pennsylvania.

Machined Metals Manufacturing (36 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Machined Metals Manufacturing
Machined Metals Manufacturing (36 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Machined Metals Manufacturing has fewer employees than the Metal cutting machine tools manufacturin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.2 2.7 3 0 0
2023 8.1 2.7 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 11.2 0.0 3 0 0
2020 6.1 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.8 0.0 2 0 0
2016 7.8 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · PA · Collegeville

391 Metal cutting machine tools manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 49 employers in Collegeville, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Church Metal Spinning 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Van Mark Products Corporation 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Voss Manufacturing Inc 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Machine Technologies 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE George Didden Greenhouses, Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Altoona 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Penn Natural Gas Williamsport 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE TIS - PA - Fairless Hills 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSKUPP 2,039 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pfizer Collegeville 1,839 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Dow Chemical Company - Collegeville, PA 649 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Collegeville 043 489 FTE
NAT-TCR Frederick & May Construction 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mmh Nursing Home 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Price Chopper #100 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Novant Health Medical Park Hospital 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE HealthWise Services 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willowbrook Solar 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE ComSonics of Massachusetts 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Lodge at Manito 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.