Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors · New Jersey

Madison Concrete Construction - PUAM

Princeton, NJ · ~31 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Madison Concrete Construction - PUAM runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Madison Concrete Construction - PUAM: 4.7 TCR = 169% of Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Madison Concrete Construction - PUAM safety composite

Madison Concrete Construction - PUAM scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2022→2023

Madison Concrete Construction - PUAM injury rate improved

Madison Concrete Construction - PUAM's TCR fell 2.9 from 6.2 in 2022 to 3.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=6.2 · 2023=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Princeton, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 169% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #14/20
  • PHOTO Pavecon
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pavecon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Madison Concrete Construction - PUAM in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Madison Concrete Construction - PUAM averages 4.7 TCR (169% of the Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Madison Concrete Construction - PUAM TCR series: 2022=6.2 · 2023=3.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Madison Concrete Construction - PUAM falls in its industry

1,314 Foundation, building, poured c establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 20 Foundation, building, poured c employers in New Jersey.

Madison Concrete Construction - PUAM (31 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Madison Concrete Construction - PUAM
Madison Concrete Construction - PUAM (31 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Madison Concrete Construction - PUAM has fewer employees than the Foundation, building, poured concrete, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2022 6.2 6.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · NJ · Princeton

1,314 Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 99 employers in Princeton, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pavecon 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SMC CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR JD Contractors, LLC 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Insul-Flow, Inc.- CA 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Orsted - Newark 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beacon Construction Services 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Neelam Construction Corp 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spiniello Companies - Livingston 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bristol Myers Squibb Company US Field Sales PPk 2,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. (OAPI) 2,094 FTE
CITY-NEAR Princeton Pike 1,963 FTE
CITY-NEAR EIC - Power 1,895 FTE
NAT-TCR Black Mountain Home for Children, Youth and Families, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR AUC-Manatee 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR King County Wastewater Treatment 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Advance Concrete Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Franklin Building Supply - Fruitland 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Real Estate Property Services, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5077 U of L Peace Hospital 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE RFI-ODFL 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.