Concrete pumping (i.e., placement) · California

Insul-Flow, Inc.- CA

Fresno, CA · ~73 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Insul-Flow, Inc.- CA runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Concrete pumping (i.e., placement) workplace, earning a grade D.

Insul-Flow, Inc.- CA: 4.7 TCR = 169% of Concrete pumping (i.e., placement) BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Insul-Flow, Inc.- CA safety composite

Insul-Flow, Inc.- CA scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.4

2017→2019

Insul-Flow, Inc.- CA injury rate improved

Insul-Flow, Inc.- CA's TCR fell 8.4 from 9.7 in 2017 to 1.3 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.7 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Fresno, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 169% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #88/166
  • PHOTO AFS Chattanooga
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AFS Chattanooga (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Insul-Flow, Inc.- CA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Insul-Flow, Inc.- CA averages 4.7 TCR (169% of the Concrete pumping (i.e., placement) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Insul-Flow, Inc.- CA TCR series: 2017=9.7 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=1.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Insul-Flow, Inc.- CA falls in its industry

1,314 Concrete pumping (i.e., placem establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #88 safest of 166 Concrete pumping (i.e., placem employers in California.

Insul-Flow, Inc.- CA (73 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Insul-Flow, Inc.- CA
Insul-Flow, Inc.- CA (73 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Insul-Flow, Inc.- CA has more employees than the Concrete pumping (i.e., placement) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2018 3.2 3.2 2 0 0
2017 9.7 4.9 2 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · CA · Fresno

1,314 Concrete pumping (i.e., placement) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AFS Chattanooga 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pavecon 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Madison Concrete Construction - PUAM 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SMC CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC. 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Columbia 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Location 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE P-R Farms Inc/Palomate Inc 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Fresno 7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ag Force LLC 6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Ctr 5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Center 4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR ArcelorMittal Shelby 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pap Lafayette 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR MN,BEMIDJI - Medical Center Campus - Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Senior Care of Meadow Creek 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ingram Micro INC - USDS 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1855-INEVA27 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1855-KSWIC071 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at University of Idaho-Student Un 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.