Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities · Ohio

Madison Facility 1 Madison Facility 1

London, OH · ~31 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Madison Facility 1 Madison Facility 1 runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Madison Facility 1 Madison Facility 1: 1.6 TCR = 42% of Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Madison Facility 1 Madison Facility 1 safety composite

Madison Facility 1 Madison Facility 1 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Madison Facility 1 Madison Facility 1: 0.0 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Madison Facility 1 Madison Facility 1's TCR rose 3.2 from 0.0 in 2023 to 3.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · London, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/155
  • PHOTO Middle Peninsula Nor…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Madison Facility 1 Madison Facility 1 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Madison Facility 1 Madison Facility 1 averages 1.6 TCR (42% of the Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Madison Facility 1 Madison Facility 1 TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Madison Facility 1 Madison Facility 1 falls in its industry

2,261 Residential Intellectual and D establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 155 Residential Intellectual and D employers in Ohio.

Madison Facility 1 Madison Facility 1 (31 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Madison Facility 1 Madison Facility 1
Madison Facility 1 Madison Facility 1 (31 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Madison Facility 1 Madison Facility 1 has fewer employees than the Residential Intellectual and Development median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · OH · London

2,261 Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 37 employers in London, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lynwood Estates 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hale Barnard Corporation 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 582613 704702_TN GREENEVILLE SWEET AFTON_ICF 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pine Valley Ranch 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Layer 5 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Croton Pullet 3 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Automotive Plant 1,519 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stanley Electric U.S Co Inc 1,191 FTE
CITY-NEAR FC: London 419 FTE
CITY-NEAR London #4684 418 FTE
NAT-TCR PTL Engineering 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Alltrista Plastics, LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Philadelphia 10145 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR City Hall 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ouzinkie Native Corporation 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nynwr - Stewart Air Gateway 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nytra - Trailer Repair Shop 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Coaches, Inc 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.