Electric power distribution systems · Wisconsin

Madison Gas and Electric Co.

Madison, WI · ~712 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Madison Gas and Electric Co. runs at 185% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade D.

Madison Gas and Electric Co.: 2.2 TCR = 185% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Madison Gas and Electric Co. safety composite

Madison Gas and Electric Co. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2023

Madison Gas and Electric Co. injury rate improved

Madison Gas and Electric Co.'s TCR fell 1.5 from 3.8 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.8 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=2.0 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Madison, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 2.2 · 185% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #14/61
  • PHOTO SENECA STREET CREW L…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 119 inj
  • SIZE ~712 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SENECA STREET CREW LOCATION-NY04 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Madison Gas and Electric Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Madison Gas and Electric Co. averages 2.2 TCR (185% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Madison Gas and Electric Co. TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=2 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=2.3 · BLS 1.2

Where Madison Gas and Electric Co. falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 61 Electric power distribution sy employers in Wisconsin.

Madison Gas and Electric Co. (712 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Madison Gas and Electric Co.
Madison Gas and Electric Co. (712 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Madison Gas and Electric Co. has more employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.3 1.9 13 0 0
2022 2.3 1.4 16 1 0
2021 1.7 1.1 12 1 0
2020 1.2 0.8 9 0 0
2019 1.4 0.9 11 0 0
2018 2.0 0.3 13 1 0
2017 3.1 1.9 21 0 0
2016 3.8 1.9 24 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · WI · Madison

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 577 employers in Madison, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SENECA STREET CREW LOCATION-NY04 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ROCKLIN FACILITY 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vermont Electric Cooperative, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Versant Power Lamoine Division 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE MillerCoors Milwaukee Brewery 712 FTE
STATE-SIZE IPP Plant 711 FTE
STATE-SIZE Footlocker.com, Inc. - Corp 713 FTE
STATE-SIZE Darien WI 709 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital - Madison 2,401 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meriter Hospital 2,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR EatStreet 1,659 FTE
CITY-NEAR TDS - Junction Road (All Employees) 1,302 FTE
NAT-TCR Ericco Mfg 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR SKF USA Inc. - Sumter 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Amityville IRA - Schleigel 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bedford Specialty Care 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE BRHMALDC - AT&T Mobility Services LLC 712 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZECO 712 FTE
NAT-SIZE LRM Encinal 712 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Education Loan Network Ins 712 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.