Manufacture of special purpose vehicles (e.g. firefighting vehicles) · Wisconsin

IPP Plant

Appleton, WI · ~711 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

IPP Plant runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Manufacture of special purpose vehicles (e.g. firefighting vehicles) workplace, earning a grade C.

IPP Plant: 3.0 TCR = 92% of Manufacture of special purpose vehicles (e.g. firefighting vehicles) BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

IPP Plant safety composite

IPP Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

IPP Plant injury rate improved

IPP Plant's TCR fell 0.4 from 4.1 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.1 · 2017=2.3 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336120 · Appleton, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 92% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #17/29
  • PHOTO Defense Logistics Se…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 166 inj
  • SIZE ~711 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Defense Logistics Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

IPP Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows IPP Plant averages 3.0 TCR (92% of the Manufacture of special purpose vehicles (e.g. firefighting vehicles) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

IPP Plant TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2017=2.3 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=2 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 3.3

Where IPP Plant falls in its industry

124 Manufacture of special purpose establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 29 Manufacture of special purpose employers in Wisconsin.

IPP Plant (711 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 223 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate IPP Plant
IPP Plant (711 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 223 employees and a TCR of 3.5

IPP Plant has more employees than the Manufacture of special purpose vehicles median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 1.8 23 0 0
2023 2.8 1.2 19 0 0
2022 2.9 1.4 21 0 0
2021 2.0 1.4 13 1 0
2020 3.6 2.4 24 1 0
2019 2.8 1.3 17 0 0
2017 2.3 0.9 20 0 0
2016 4.1 1.8 29 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336120 · WI · Appleton

124 Manufacture of special purpose vehicles (e.g. firefighting vehicles) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 356 employers in Appleton, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Defense Logistics Service Center 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Custom Built 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR EONE 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR T&T Sales Inc. 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Madison Gas and Electric Co. 712 FTE
STATE-SIZE MillerCoors Milwaukee Brewery 712 FTE
STATE-SIZE Darien WI 709 FTE
STATE-SIZE Footlocker.com, Inc. - Corp 713 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center Appleton 1,649 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center-Appleton 1,563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Operations 1,321 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fox Valley Technical College (WI) 1,279 FTE
NAT-TCR Denver Paxton 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Adams Pointe 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR VanLaan Concrete Construction 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Command Construction Industries 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Austin 711 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adirondack Medical Center 711 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Motor Wheel of America 711 FTE
NAT-SIZE Creative Liquid Coatings, Inc. Kendallville 711 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.