Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Washington

Madison

Seattle, WA · ~37 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Madison runs at 516% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Madison: 19.6 TCR = 516% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Madison safety composite

Madison scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 31.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Madison: 0.0 → 37.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 37.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.61× in 2024

Madison's TCR rose 37.1 from 0.0 in 2022 to 37.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Seattle, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 19.6 · 516% of ind

  • DART 31.5 DART
  • RANK #203/216
  • PHOTO Regent Court Senior …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Regent Court Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Madison in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Madison averages 19.6 TCR (516% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Madison TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=21.7 · 2024=37.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Madison falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #203 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Madison (37 employees, TCR 19.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Madison
Madison (37 employees, TCR 19.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Madison has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 37.1 31.5 14 19 0
2023 21.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WA · Seattle

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Regent Court Senior Living 19.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Bungalows at Fayetteville 19.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LB-HHH2-SPRING ARBOR LEESBURG 19.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atascadero Christian Home 19.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE G & D Wallace, Inc 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Naumes, Inc. Pateros Orchard 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pasco Farm - Burbank 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Janicki Logging & Construction Co., Inc. 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0630 Pittsburgh 19.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Saco Crisis 19.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Elk Grove Distribution Center 19.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Common Market 7th Street 19.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE DFC Manufacturing Group LLC dba Sharples 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE A. W. Farrell & Son, Inc. - Erie 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cesco Plant 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kamps Pallets Niles 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.