Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Regent Court Senior Living

Corvallis, OR · ~49 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Regent Court Senior Living runs at 516% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Regent Court Senior Living: 19.6 TCR = 516% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Regent Court Senior Living safety composite

Regent Court Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Regent Court Senior Living: 9.2 → 18.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 30.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.19× in 2019

Regent Court Senior Living's TCR rose 9.4 from 9.2 in 2017 to 18.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 30.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Corvallis, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 19.6 · 516% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #195/218
  • PHOTO Madison
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Madison (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Regent Court Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Regent Court Senior Living averages 19.6 TCR (516% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Regent Court Senior Living TCR series: 2017=9.2 · 2018=30.9 · 2019=18.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Regent Court Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #195 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Regent Court Senior Living (49 employees, TCR 19.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Regent Court Senior Living
Regent Court Senior Living (49 employees, TCR 19.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Regent Court Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 18.7 3.7 5 0 0
2018 30.9 23.8 10 3 0
2017 9.2 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Corvallis

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 118 employers in Corvallis, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Madison 19.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Bungalows at Fayetteville 19.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LB-HHH2-SPRING ARBOR LEESBURG 19.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atascadero Christian Home 19.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Polehn Farms Inc 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fessler Nursery Company 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE UNIVERSAL SEED LLC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunnyview (Shared Services + MVS Admin + Warehouse) 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oregon State University 12,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR Good Samaritan Hospital 1,944 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corvallis, Oregon 1,322 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Corvallis Clinic PC 681 FTE
NAT-TCR Casa de Oro Center 19.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodwill of Colorado - Platte 19.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-ABS-0029-0028-00707 19.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Chuckawalla Valley State Prison 19.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Third Florida Living Options, LLC 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE NH.MANCH.1 - Ricoh Americas Holdings, Inc. 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE FoodTown #212 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Norcross GA-USA 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.