Apparel findings and trimmings cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) · Illinois

Magid Glove and Safety

Romeoville, IL · ~692 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Magid Glove and Safety runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Apparel findings and trimmings cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) workplace, earning a grade A.

Magid Glove and Safety: 0.7 TCR = 22% of Apparel findings and trimmings cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Magid Glove and Safety safety composite

Magid Glove and Safety scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Magid Glove and Safety: 0.7 → 1.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 1.5 TCR · DART/TCR 2.07× in 2020

Magid Glove and Safety's TCR rose 0.9 from 0.7 in 2017 to 1.5 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 2.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 315990 · Romeoville, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 22% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Chums
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~692 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chums (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Magid Glove and Safety in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Magid Glove and Safety averages 0.7 TCR (22% of the Apparel findings and trimmings cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Magid Glove and Safety TCR series: 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Magid Glove and Safety falls in its industry

62 Apparel findings and trimmings establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Apparel findings and trimmings employers in Illinois.

Magid Glove and Safety (692 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 111 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Magid Glove and Safety
Magid Glove and Safety (692 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 111 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Magid Glove and Safety has more employees than the Apparel findings and trimmings cut and s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.5 1.5 8 0 0
2019 0.6 0.5 3 1 0
2018 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2017 0.7 0.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

315990 · IL · Romeoville

62 Apparel findings and trimmings cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 172 employers in Romeoville, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chums 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR USA-UT: Kilm 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corp. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DAYSTAR APPAREL 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hydro-Gear, Sullivan 692 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dot Transportation, Inc.- MTS DTI 692 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oak Lawn 691 FTE
STATE-SIZE ILARL327 ASCENSION ST JOSEPH ELGIN 693 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hearthside Food Solutions, LLC Romeoville 1,197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC - 444 755 FTE
CITY-NEAR Magid Glove and Safety Manufacturing Company LLC 751 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DCH6 745 FTE
NAT-TCR Hinkle Environmental Services, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Neshoba County General Hospital 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Schlumberger Technologies 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR ASO 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE ASP Offenders 692 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eastern Oregon University 692 FTE
NAT-SIZE Axium Plastics New Albany 692 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kraft Heinz Company Coshocton 692 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.