Glass, automotive, made from purchased glass · Michigan

Magna Mirrors - Lowell Division

Alto, MI · ~531 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Magna Mirrors - Lowell Division runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Glass, automotive, made from purchased glass workplace, earning a grade C.

Magna Mirrors - Lowell Division: 3.5 TCR = 105% of Glass, automotive, made from purchased glass BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Magna Mirrors - Lowell Division safety composite

Magna Mirrors - Lowell Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Magna Mirrors - Lowell Division held a steady TCR band

Magna Mirrors - Lowell Division's TCR held near 0.1 from 2.7 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.7 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=3.0 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=3.0 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327215 · Alto, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 105% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #11/20
  • PHOTO SCHOTT Gemtron
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 85 inj
  • SIZE ~531 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SCHOTT Gemtron (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Magna Mirrors - Lowell Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Magna Mirrors - Lowell Division averages 3.5 TCR (105% of the Glass, automotive, made from purchased glass BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Magna Mirrors - Lowell Division TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=3 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=3 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Magna Mirrors - Lowell Division falls in its industry

441 Glass, automotive, made from p establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 20 Glass, automotive, made from p employers in Michigan.

Magna Mirrors - Lowell Division (531 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Magna Mirrors - Lowell Division
Magna Mirrors - Lowell Division (531 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Magna Mirrors - Lowell Division has more employees than the Glass, automotive, made from purchased g median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.3 17 1 0
2023 3.0 2.0 14 4 0
2022 3.8 2.9 17 5 0
2021 3.8 3.2 7 12 0
2019 3.0 2.8 9 6 0
2018 5.5 5.2 13 17 0
2016 2.7 1.8 8 7 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327215 · MI · Alto

441 Glass, automotive, made from purchased glass employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 5 employers in Alto, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SCHOTT Gemtron 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR FICOSA NORTH AMERICA COOKEVILLE 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Warrenton 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trulite Grenada 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rivian Automotive, Inc. - Plymouth 532 FTE
STATE-SIZE MillerKnoll, Inc. - Design Yard 530 FTE
STATE-SIZE 253917-GRAND RAPIDS P&DF 532 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mitchell- Hamtramck 532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stedfast construction inc 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stedfast 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Altogas, Inc. 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fischer Idema Excavating 32 FTE
NAT-TCR Maggio Data Forms 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Landing at Williamsburg 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sycamore Creek Healthcare Group 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunrise Cooperative - Botkins 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE UMElPresidente959 531 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alkermes Inc. - Wilmington 531 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crane Worldwide- Houston 531 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trulieve Jefferson County 531 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.