Retirement communities, continuing care · Nebraska

Landing at Williamsburg

Lincoln, NE · ~106 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Landing at Williamsburg runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade C.

Landing at Williamsburg: 3.5 TCR = 92% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Landing at Williamsburg safety composite

Landing at Williamsburg scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2024

Landing at Williamsburg injury rate improved

Landing at Williamsburg's TCR fell 1.6 from 3.0 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2017=12.1 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Lincoln, NE AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 92% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #13/56
  • PHOTO Wesley Towers, Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wesley Towers, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Landing at Williamsburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Landing at Williamsburg averages 3.5 TCR (92% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Landing at Williamsburg TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=12.1 · 2018=3 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Landing at Williamsburg falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 56 Retirement communities, contin employers in Nebraska.

Landing at Williamsburg (106 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Landing at Williamsburg
Landing at Williamsburg (106 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Landing at Williamsburg has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2023 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2022 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2021 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2020 4.5 4.5 3 0 0
2019 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2018 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2017 12.1 6.0 8 0 0
2016 3.0 3.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NE · Lincoln

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 496 employers in Lincoln, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wesley Towers, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brightview Mays Chapel Ridge 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-483359 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 59_65 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lincoln 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE TJ Cable and Underground Services LLC 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Point Dairy Products Nebraska 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glenn Valley Foods 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nelnet Servicing LLC 2,850 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nelnet - Lincoln HQ 2,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bryan East Campus 2,358 FTE
CITY-NEAR FACTS Education Corporation 1,986 FTE
NAT-TCR Sunrise Cooperative - Botkins 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Maggio Data Forms 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Magna Mirrors - Lowell Division 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR O&R Port Jervis 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Franklin 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE FSG-New Mexico 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #4097 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #6523 106 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.