Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Magnolia Court

Nacogdoches, TX · ~44 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Magnolia Court runs at 306% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Magnolia Court: 11.6 TCR = 306% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Magnolia Court safety composite

Magnolia Court scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Magnolia Court: 0.0 → 27.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 51.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.39× in 2022

Magnolia Court's TCR rose 27.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 27.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 51.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Nacogdoches, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.6 · 306% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #389/470
  • PHOTO Somerset Court of Ch…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Somerset Court of Cherryville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Magnolia Court in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Magnolia Court averages 11.6 TCR (306% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Magnolia Court TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=11.1 · 2020=51.4 · 2021=31.4 · 2022=27.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Magnolia Court falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #389 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Magnolia Court (44 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Magnolia Court
Magnolia Court (44 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Magnolia Court has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 27.3 4.5 6 0 0
2021 31.4 17.4 3 6 0
2020 51.4 40.0 4 14 0
2019 11.1 2.8 4 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · Nacogdoches

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 94 employers in Nacogdoches, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Somerset Court of Cherryville 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SPRING ARBOR OF WILMINGTON 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morningside of Jackson 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR B-X North Andover LLC 11.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corteva - Lubbock Research 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE WRANGLER FEED YARD 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Devon Energy Corporation - Cresson 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Driver Directional, Inc. 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pilgrims Nacogdoches Complex 1,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nacogdoches Memorial Hospital 676 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nacogdoches County Hospital District 461 FTE
CITY-NEAR 449 NACOGDOCHES MEDICAL CENTER 436 FTE
NAT-TCR Opengate,Inc./Lehr and Feinsilver Residence 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 114400-Jax-Arlington Sta 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-00290 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-01125 11.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lone Oak Assisted Living 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hackettstown, NJ 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverside Rehabilitation Center-Hampton 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE HDS-St. Louis MB 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.