Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Lone Oak Assisted Living

Eugene, OR · ~44 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lone Oak Assisted Living runs at 273% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Lone Oak Assisted Living: 10.4 TCR = 273% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lone Oak Assisted Living safety composite

Lone Oak Assisted Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 18.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lone Oak Assisted Living: 0.0 → 320.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 320.0 TCR · DART/TCR 23.14× in 2022

Lone Oak Assisted Living's TCR rose 320.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 320.0 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 23.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Eugene, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.4 · 273% of ind

  • DART 240.0 DART
  • RANK #121/218
  • PHOTO Corvallis Memory Car…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Corvallis Memory Care, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Lone Oak Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lone Oak Assisted Living averages 10.4 TCR (273% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lone Oak Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=17.3 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=14.8 · 2021=18.9 · 2022=320 · BLS 3.8

Where Lone Oak Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #121 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Lone Oak Assisted Living (44 employees, TCR 10.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Lone Oak Assisted Living
Lone Oak Assisted Living (44 employees, TCR 10.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Lone Oak Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 320.0 240.0 4 0 0
2021 18.9 18.9 5 3 0
2020 14.8 12.4 6 0 0
2019 5.6 5.6 2 0 0
2018 5.7 2.8 2 0 0
2017 17.3 13.8 4 1 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Eugene

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 466 employers in Eugene, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Corvallis Memory Care, LLC 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Welcome Home Management - Potter Ridge 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6848-68480001-000001 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spectrum Health Companies Aurora 10.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Snake River Produce Co., LLC 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE KG Farms, Inc. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACW Inc. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Wolf Vineyards, Inc 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR MATT KNIGHT ARENA 863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hult Center for the Performing Arts 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHMG PHOR Clinics 848 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHMC at University District 564 FTE
NAT-TCR 382556-Ely-North Ridgeville Br 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 118432-Sar-Gulfgate Br 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0034-0034-02838 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 350988-Bkn-Stuyvesant Sta 10.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Magnolia Court 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oak Hills Terrace Memory Care 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hackettstown, NJ 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverside Rehabilitation Center-Hampton 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.