Retirement homes without nursing care · Mississippi

Magnolia Gardens of Greenville

Greenville, MS · ~26 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Magnolia Gardens of Greenville runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Retirement homes without nursing care workplace, earning a grade C.

Magnolia Gardens of Greenville: 3.5 TCR = 91% of Retirement homes without nursing care BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Magnolia Gardens of Greenville safety composite

Magnolia Gardens of Greenville scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
F 18.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Magnolia Gardens of Greenville: 0.0 → 18.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 55.6 TCR · DART/TCR 5.22× in 2024

Magnolia Gardens of Greenville's TCR rose 18.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 18.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 55.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 5.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Greenville, MS AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 91% of ind

  • DART 18.1 DART
  • RANK #12/29
  • PHOTO Highpoint at Cape Co…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Highpoint at Cape Coral (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Magnolia Gardens of Greenville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Magnolia Gardens of Greenville averages 3.5 TCR (91% of the Retirement homes without nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Magnolia Gardens of Greenville TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=55.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=18.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Magnolia Gardens of Greenville falls in its industry

6,510 Retirement homes without nursi establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 29 Retirement homes without nursi employers in Mississippi.

Magnolia Gardens of Greenville (26 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Magnolia Gardens of Greenville
Magnolia Gardens of Greenville (26 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Magnolia Gardens of Greenville has fewer employees than the Retirement homes without nursing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 18.1 18.1 1 2 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 55.6 55.6 0 9 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.0 0.0 1 0 0
2018 4.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MS · Greenville

6,510 Retirement homes without nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 52 employers in Greenville, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Highpoint at Cape Coral 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sienna Crest Mineral Point 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barrington of West Chester 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Waterford at Corpus Christi 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1521 S FRONTAGE RD COLUMBUS MS 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Constuction 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prairie Construction,L.L.C. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ergon Construction Group - ISO Services Richland 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR 182 353 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 182 346 FTE
CITY-NEAR USG Interiors Greenville 210 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tropicana Casino Greenville 186 FTE
NAT-TCR Pitt & Greene Electric Membership Corporation 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Laitram Machinery 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Joseph's Hospital of Buckhannon 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pinnick Inc 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE International Management Company 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keokuk Municipal Waterworks 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stay Golden Restaurants, LLC 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.