All-terrain vehicles (ATVs), wheeled or tracked, manufacturing · Michigan

Mahindra Automotive North America

Auburn Hills, MI · ~172 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mahindra Automotive North America runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical All-terrain vehicles (ATVs), wheeled or tracked, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Mahindra Automotive North America: 0.9 TCR = 28% of All-terrain vehicles (ATVs), wheeled or tracked, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mahindra Automotive North America safety composite

Mahindra Automotive North America scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2018→2020

Mahindra Automotive North America injury rate improved

Mahindra Automotive North America's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.1 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.1 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336999 · Auburn Hills, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO Dexter Axle
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~172 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dexter Axle (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Mahindra Automotive North America in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mahindra Automotive North America averages 0.9 TCR (28% of the All-terrain vehicles (ATVs), wheeled or tracked, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mahindra Automotive North America TCR series: 2018=1.1 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Mahindra Automotive North America falls in its industry

85 All-terrain vehicles (ATVs), w establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 All-terrain vehicles (ATVs), w employers in Michigan.

Mahindra Automotive North America (172 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 114 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mahindra Automotive North America
Mahindra Automotive North America (172 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 114 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Mahindra Automotive North America has more employees than the All-terrain vehicles (ATVs), wheeled or median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.8 1.8 5 3 0
2018 1.1 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336999 · MI · Auburn Hills

85 All-terrain vehicles (ATVs), wheeled or tracked, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 215 employers in Auburn Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dexter Axle 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tenneco Automotive 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 67220099--MERCEDES-BENZ US INTL INC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Honda of South Carolina Mfg. Inc. 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE JH Campbell Annex 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spence Brothers 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE UNIT855 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kamps Corporate 172 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology Center 14,088 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology 12,609 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental - Auburn Hills North 1,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTC Pilot Plant 1,094 FTE
NAT-TCR Park Manor of Cypress Station 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Suburban Electric 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR DDSI Chesapeake I 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Westlake Vinyls Company L.P. 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Flora CUSD #35 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE PATTank 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dave's Fresh Marketplace of Smithfield Crossings, Inc 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weidplas North America, LLC 172 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.