Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing · Wisconsin

Main Corporate Office

Germantown, WI · ~205 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Main Corporate Office runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Main Corporate Office: 2.8 TCR = 85% of Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Main Corporate Office safety composite

Main Corporate Office scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Main Corporate Office held a steady TCR band

Main Corporate Office's TCR held near 0.3 from 2.5 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.5 · 2017=4.2 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=2.7 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334418 · Germantown, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 85% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #12/15
  • PHOTO Kirby Risk Service C…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~205 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kirby Risk Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Main Corporate Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Main Corporate Office averages 2.8 TCR (85% of the Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Main Corporate Office TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=4.2 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=2.7 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Main Corporate Office falls in its industry

236 Printed circuit assemblies man establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 15 Printed circuit assemblies man employers in Wisconsin.

Main Corporate Office (205 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Main Corporate Office
Main Corporate Office (205 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Main Corporate Office has more employees than the Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 0.5 6 0 0
2023 2.9 1.9 6 0 0
2022 2.7 1.6 5 0 0
2020 2.7 2.1 5 0 0
2019 2.1 0.5 4 0 0
2017 4.2 2.6 8 0 0
2016 2.5 1.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334418 · WI · Germantown

236 Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 112 employers in Germantown, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kirby Risk Service Center 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Offices 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Electronic Systems, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Micro Control Company 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hurckman Mechanical Industries 205 FTE
STATE-SIZE Richland Center West 205 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charter Next Generation - Milton 205 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rhinelander 205 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ellsworth Corporation - Germantown, Wisconsin 428 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1515 376 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1515 366 FTE
CITY-NEAR Weimer Bearing & Transmission, Inc. 353 FTE
NAT-TCR Industrial First, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR American Fence - Phoenix, AZ 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lampe & Malphrus Lumber Company - Sawmill 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Virginia Department of Corrections 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Select Specialty Hospital - Midtown Atlanta, LLC 205 FTE
NAT-SIZE MBL USA Corporation 205 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silgan Containers Rochelle 205 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Memorial Hospital 205 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.