Sawmills · North Carolina

Lampe & Malphrus Lumber Company - Sawmill

Smithfield, NC · ~61 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lampe & Malphrus Lumber Company - Sawmill runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Sawmills workplace, earning a grade C.

Lampe & Malphrus Lumber Company - Sawmill: 2.8 TCR = 85% of Sawmills BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lampe & Malphrus Lumber Company - Sawmill safety composite

Lampe & Malphrus Lumber Company - Sawmill scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.0

2016→2024

Lampe & Malphrus Lumber Company - Sawmill injury rate improved

Lampe & Malphrus Lumber Company - Sawmill's TCR fell 7.0 from 7.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.0 · 2017=8.0 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321113 · Smithfield, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 85% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/34
  • PHOTO Longview Lumber
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Longview Lumber (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Lampe & Malphrus Lumber Company - Sawmill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lampe & Malphrus Lumber Company - Sawmill averages 2.8 TCR (85% of the Sawmills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lampe & Malphrus Lumber Company - Sawmill TCR series: 2016=7 · 2017=8 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Lampe & Malphrus Lumber Company - Sawmill falls in its industry

905 Sawmills establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 34 Sawmills employers in North Carolina.

Lampe & Malphrus Lumber Company - Sawmill (61 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lampe & Malphrus Lumber Company - Sawmill
Lampe & Malphrus Lumber Company - Sawmill (61 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Lampe & Malphrus Lumber Company - Sawmill has fewer employees than the Sawmills median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2018 6.7 0.0 5 0 1
2017 8.0 2.7 5 1 0
2016 7.0 2.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321113 · NC · Smithfield

905 Sawmills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 62 employers in Smithfield, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Longview Lumber 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kinzua/Pilot Rock - WP 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lincoln Lumber Company, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lumberton 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE H. F. Lee Energy Complex 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Winston Salem Resource Center - PNG 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charlotte Division 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE WESTFIELD REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnston Health 1,593 FTE
CITY-NEAR Government Complex (County Courts, Administration & Law Enforcement Buildings) 790 FTE
CITY-NEAR AAF Flanders Smithfield 428 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1321 401 FTE
NAT-TCR Virginia Department of Corrections 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR American Fence - Phoenix, AZ 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Dayton, Oh Branch 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial First, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE B-W Grinding Service, Inc. 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stones River Central Office 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Doyle Production Plant 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forino Co., LP 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.