manufacturing · Wisconsin

Main facility -BCI Burke Co.

Fond Du Lac, WI · ~153 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Main facility -BCI Burke Co. runs at 276% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Main facility -BCI Burke Co.: 9.1 TCR = 276% of manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Main facility -BCI Burke Co. safety composite

Main facility -BCI Burke Co. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2016→2023

Main facility -BCI Burke Co. injury rate improved

Main facility -BCI Burke Co.'s TCR fell 3.2 from 8.3 in 2016 to 5.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 13.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.3 · 2017=13.3 · 2018=13.4 · 2019=11.3 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=8.0 · 2022=7.1 · 2023=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339920 · Fond Du Lac, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.1 · 276% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #14/17
  • PHOTO Mervin Manufacturing
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 100 inj
  • SIZE ~153 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mervin Manufacturing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Main facility -BCI Burke Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Main facility -BCI Burke Co. averages 9.1 TCR (276% of the manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Main facility -BCI Burke Co. TCR series: 2016=8.3 · 2017=13.3 · 2018=13.4 · 2019=11.3 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=8 · 2022=7.1 · 2023=5.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Main facility -BCI Burke Co. falls in its industry

197 manufacturing establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 17 manufacturing employers in Wisconsin.

Main facility -BCI Burke Co. (153 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Main facility -BCI Burke Co.
Main facility -BCI Burke Co. (153 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Main facility -BCI Burke Co. has more employees than the manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.1 3.6 13 0 0
2022 7.1 6.6 14 0 0
2021 8.0 6.2 13 0 0
2020 6.1 4.6 8 0 0
2019 11.3 10.6 16 0 0
2018 13.4 7.1 16 1 0
2017 13.3 4.1 13 0 0
2016 8.3 4.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339920 · WI · Fond Du Lac

197 manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 134 employers in Fond Du Lac, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mervin Manufacturing 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Playworld - New Berlin 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adirondack 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nautilus, Inc. - Brooklyn Park 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hottmann Construction Company, Inc. 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kemps Cedarburg Plant 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE WI001 Green Bay Packerland SPG 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amcor Healthcare Packaging- New London 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercury Marine FdL Campus 3,778 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercury Marine Fond du Lac 3,735 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ahern Fond du Lac - Corporate 1,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Agnes Hospital 1,479 FTE
NAT-TCR Amac Enterprises, Inc. 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR PF Williamson Ranch Fitness, LLC 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ARS Aleut Demolition Services, LLC - Y-12 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Garrett Container Systems, Inc. 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Case Paper Co, Inc 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Parkersburg 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smith + Nephew,Inc Biotherapeutics 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holy Family Medical Center 153 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.