Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Main Facility - Weaver / Sommers

Cochranton, PA · ~75 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Main Facility - Weaver / Sommers runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Main Facility - Weaver / Sommers: 1.7 TCR = 53% of Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Main Facility - Weaver / Sommers safety composite

Main Facility - Weaver / Sommers scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Main Facility - Weaver / Sommers held a steady TCR band

Main Facility - Weaver / Sommers's TCR held near 0.3 from 1.4 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.4 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · Cochranton, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 53% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #3/62
  • PHOTO Jacob A Weaver Company
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jacob A Weaver Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Main Facility - Weaver / Sommers in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Main Facility - Weaver / Sommers averages 1.7 TCR (53% of the Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Main Facility - Weaver / Sommers TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Main Facility - Weaver / Sommers falls in its industry

952 Pallets, wood or wood and meta establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 62 Pallets, wood or wood and meta employers in Pennsylvania.

Main Facility - Weaver / Sommers (75 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Main Facility - Weaver / Sommers
Main Facility - Weaver / Sommers (75 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

Main Facility - Weaver / Sommers has more employees than the Pallets, wood or wood and metal combinat median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2020 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2017 4.2 2.8 3 0 0
2016 1.4 1.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · PA · Cochranton

952 Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 14 employers in Cochranton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jacob A Weaver Company 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR W D Townley & Son Lumber Co Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bentonville 134 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Recycled Gray Court (UT1S) 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kaolin Mushroom Farms - Starr Road Complex 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5D Field Services, LLC 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE FMS Construction Company 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE B&D Builders 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - Meadville 292 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vitro Flat Glass LLC 254 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vitro Meadville Flat Glass LLC 180 FTE
CITY-NEAR JM Manufacturing 100 FTE
NAT-TCR Fluke Electronics- Keene 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Behr Yale 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Eagle Natrium, LLC 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dot Transportation, Inc- NY 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Unison Drilling Inc. 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weather Shield Grand Rapids 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE 116 Elburn and Countryside Fire Protection Di 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texas #54 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.